Suppr超能文献

重新构想学院和药学教育认证委员会标准修订过程中的评估。

Reenvisioning assessment for the Academy and the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education's standards revision process.

机构信息

University of Minnesota College of Pharmacy, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

出版信息

Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 Sep 12;77(7):141. doi: 10.5688/ajpe777141.

Abstract

Assessment has become a major aspect of accreditation processes across all of higher education. As the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) plans a major revision to the standards for doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) education, an in-depth, scholarly review of the approaches and strategies for assessment in the PharmD program accreditation process is warranted. This paper provides 3 goals and 7 recommendations to strengthen assessment in accreditation standards. The goals include: (1) simplified standards with a focus on accountability and improvement, (2) institutionalization of assessment efforts; and (3) innovation in assessment. Evolving and shaping assessment practices is not the sole responsibility of the accreditation standards. Assessment requires commitment and dedication from individual faculty members, colleges and schools, and organizations supporting the college and schools, such as the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy. Therefore, this paper also challenges the academy and its members to optimize assessment practices.

摘要

评估已成为高等教育所有领域认证过程的主要方面。随着药学教育认证委员会(ACPE)计划对药学博士(PharmD)教育标准进行重大修订,深入、学术性地审查 PharmD 项目认证过程中的方法和策略是必要的。本文提出了 3 个目标和 7 条建议,以加强认证标准中的评估。这些目标包括:(1)简化标准,重点关注问责制和改进;(2)评估工作的制度化;(3)评估的创新。评估实践的不断发展和塑造不仅仅是认证标准的责任。评估需要个人教师、学院和学校以及支持学院和学校的组织(如美国药学院协会)的承诺和奉献。因此,本文还向学术界及其成员提出挑战,要求他们优化评估实践。

相似文献

2
A Modified Approach to Setting Curriculum Boundaries in Pharmacy School.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2018 Nov;82(9):7010. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7010.
3
ACPE wants input on standards for Pharm.D. degree.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2004 Mar 15;61(6):549. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/61.6.549a.
4
Creating and sustaining a culture of assessment.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2008 Oct 15;72(5):97. doi: 10.5688/aj720597.
6
Professional technical standards in colleges and schools of pharmacy.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2011 Apr 11;75(3):50. doi: 10.5688/ajpe75350.
7
Progress examinations in pharmacy education.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2007 Aug 15;71(4):66. doi: 10.5688/aj710466.
8
A Systematic Review of APPE Readiness Assessments Utilized by US Schools of Pharmacy.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2024 Feb;88(2):100650. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.100650. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
9

本文引用的文献

1
Are we producing innovators and leaders or change resisters and followers?
Am J Pharm Educ. 2012 Sep 10;76(7):124. doi: 10.5688/ajpe767124.
2
Building a multi-institutional community of practice to foster assessment.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2012 May 10;76(4):58. doi: 10.5688/ajpe76458.
4
Report of the 2010-2011 Academic Affairs Standing Committee.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2011 Dec 15;75(10):S12. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7510S12.
5
A model for curricular quality assessment and improvement.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2011 Dec 15;75(10):196. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7510196.
6
Assessment to transform competency-based curricula.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2009 Dec 17;73(8):158. doi: 10.5688/aj7308158.
7
A case study in implementing CQI in a nursing education program.
J Prof Nurs. 2001 Nov-Dec;17(6):297-304. doi: 10.1053/jpnu.2001.28187.
9
Teaching medical faculty how to apply continuous quality improvement to medical education.
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1998 Nov;24(11):640-52. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30412-6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验