Sedley William, Cunningham Mark O
Institute of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University Medical School Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Sep 20;7:595. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00595.
Cortical gamma oscillations occur alongside perceptual processes, and in proportion to perceptual salience. They have a number of properties that make them ideal candidates to explain perception, including incorporating synchronized discharges of neural assemblies, and their emergence over a fast timescale consistent with that of perception. These observations have led to widespread assumptions that gamma oscillations' role is to cause or facilitate conscious perception (i.e., a "positive" role). While the majority of the human literature on gamma oscillations is consistent with this interpretation, many or most of these studies could equally be interpreted as showing a suppressive or inhibitory (i.e., "negative") role. For example, presenting a stimulus and recording a response of increased gamma oscillations would only suggest a role for gamma oscillations in the representation of that stimulus, and would not specify what that role were; if gamma oscillations were inhibitory, then they would become selectively activated in response to the stimulus they acted to inhibit. In this review, we consider two classes of gamma oscillations: "broadband" and "narrowband," which have very different properties (and likely roles). We first discuss studies on gamma oscillations that are non-discriminatory, with respect to the role of gamma oscillations, followed by studies that specifically support specifically a positive or negative role. These include work on perception in healthy individuals, and in the pathological contexts of phantom perception and epilepsy. Reference is based as much as possible on magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG) studies, but we also consider evidence from invasive recordings in humans and other animals. Attempts are made to reconcile findings within a common framework. We conclude with a summary of the pertinent questions that remain unanswered, and suggest how future studies might address these.
皮层γ振荡与感知过程同时出现,并与感知显著性成正比。它们具有许多特性,使其成为解释感知的理想候选者,包括整合神经集合的同步放电,以及它们在与感知一致的快速时间尺度上的出现。这些观察结果导致了广泛的假设,即γ振荡的作用是引起或促进有意识的感知(即“积极”作用)。虽然关于γ振荡的大多数人类文献都与这种解释一致,但其中许多或大多数研究同样可以解释为显示出抑制性或抑制作用(即“消极”作用)。例如,呈现一个刺激并记录γ振荡增加的反应,只能表明γ振荡在该刺激的表征中的作用,而无法确定该作用是什么;如果γ振荡是抑制性的,那么它们会在对其作用抑制的刺激做出反应时被选择性激活。在这篇综述中,我们考虑两类γ振荡:“宽带”和“窄带”,它们具有非常不同的特性(以及可能的作用)。我们首先讨论关于γ振荡作用的非区分性研究,然后是特别支持积极或消极作用的研究。这些研究包括对健康个体感知的研究,以及幻肢感知和癫痫等病理情况下的研究。参考文献尽可能基于脑磁图(MEG)和脑电图(EEG)研究,但我们也考虑来自人类和其他动物侵入性记录的证据。我们试图在一个共同的框架内协调研究结果。我们最后总结了仍然未得到解答的相关问题,并提出未来研究可能如何解决这些问题。