Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013 Nov;14(11):801-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.08.002. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
Clinical practice guidelines specific to the medical care of frail older adults have yet to be widely disseminated. Because of the complex conditions associated with frailty, guidelines for frail older patients should be based on careful consideration of the characteristics of this population, balanced against the benefits and harms associated with treatment. In response to this need, the Diabetes Care Program of Nova Scotia (DCPNS) collaborated with the Palliative and Therapeutic Harmonization (PATH) program to develop and disseminate guidelines for the treatment of frail older adults with type 2 diabetes. The DCPNS/PATH guidelines are unique in that they recommend the following: 1. Maintain HbA1c at or above 8% rather than below a specific level, in keeping with the conclusion that lower HbA1c levels are associated with increased hypoglycemic events without accruing meaningful benefit for frail older adults with type 2 diabetes. The guideline supports a wide range of acceptable HbA1c targets so that treatment decisions can focus on whether to aim for HbA1c levels between 8% and 9% or within a higher range (ie, >9% and <12%) based on individual circumstances and symptoms. 2. Simplify treatment by administering basal insulin alone and avoiding administration of regular and rapid-acting insulin when feasible. This recommendation takes into account the variations in oral intake that are commonly associated with frailty. 3. Use neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin instead of long-acting insulin analogues, such as insulin glargine (Lantus) or insulin detemir (Levemir), as insulin analogues do not appear to provide clinically meaningful benefit but are significantly more costly. 4. With acceptance of more liberalized blood glucose targets, there is no need for routine blood glucose testing when oral hypoglycemic medications or well-established doses of basal insulin (used alone) are not routinely changed as a result of blood glucose testing.Although these recommendations may appear radical, they are based on careful review of research findings.
针对体弱老年人医疗护理的临床实践指南尚未广泛传播。由于体弱与复杂的状况相关,针对体弱老年患者的指南应该基于对该人群特征的仔细考虑,并与治疗相关的获益和危害相平衡。为了满足这一需求,新斯科舍省糖尿病护理计划(DCPNS)与姑息治疗和治疗协调(PATH)计划合作,制定和传播了针对 2 型糖尿病体弱老年人的治疗指南。DCPNS/PATH 指南的独特之处在于,它们建议:1. 将糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)维持在 8%或以上,而不是低于特定水平,这与以下结论一致,即较低的 HbA1c 水平与低血糖事件增加相关,而对于 2 型糖尿病的体弱老年人则没有明显获益。该指南支持广泛可接受的 HbA1c 目标,以便治疗决策可以集中在是否根据个体情况和症状将 HbA1c 水平目标设定在 8%至 9%之间或更高范围(即>9%且<12%)。2. 通过单独施用基础胰岛素简化治疗,并在可行的情况下避免施用常规和速效胰岛素。这一建议考虑到与体弱相关的常见口服摄入变化。3. 使用中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素(NPH)胰岛素代替长效胰岛素类似物,如甘精胰岛素(Lantus)或地特胰岛素(Levemir),因为胰岛素类似物似乎没有提供临床意义上的获益,但成本却显著更高。4. 在接受更宽松的血糖目标后,当由于血糖检测而未常规改变口服降糖药物或基础胰岛素(单独使用)的既定剂量时,无需常规进行血糖检测。尽管这些建议似乎很激进,但它们是基于对研究结果的仔细审查。