Interdisciplinary Centre for Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Public Health, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany.
Health Policy. 2013 Nov;113(1-2):20-37. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.08.008. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
In early 2012, a number of serious events in the implant area raised public awareness and started a discussion on safety issues and monitoring medical devices in academics and politics. Apparently, there is a lack in the surveillance of medical devices. Therefore, the objective of this work is to detect and classify implant registries in Europe.
A systematic search of literature was carried out to identify the different types of registries. Furthermore, to characterize the implant registries by different criteria a medical device classification system was established. One hundred and one European registries were found. Most registries exist in the field of cardiac implants and arthroplasty (38 and 29) and their distribution showed variation within Europe. For a lot of implant categories, none or very few registries could be identified. Some countries run more registries than others. There are a lot of differences in aim and structure among the registries.
There is only a limited number of reviews on registries and a centralized monitoring system in Europe is missing. Our results reveal a lack of transparency concerning number, aim, structure and quality of registries. This is crucial, as registries work as early warning systems for identifying and notifying patients at risk.
2012 年初,一些严重的植入物事件引起了公众的关注,并在学术界和政界引发了关于医疗器械安全性和监测问题的讨论。显然,医疗器械监测存在不足。因此,这项工作的目的是检测和分类欧洲的植入物登记处。
进行了系统的文献搜索,以确定不同类型的登记处。此外,为了通过不同标准对植入物登记处进行特征描述,建立了一个医疗器械分类系统。发现了 101 个欧洲登记处。大多数登记处存在于心脏植入物和关节置换领域(38 个和 29 个),其分布在欧洲内部存在差异。对于许多植入物类别,无法确定或只有很少的登记处。一些国家的登记处比其他国家多。这些登记处的目的和结构存在很多差异。
欧洲只有有限的关于登记处的综述,也缺少集中的监测系统。我们的研究结果显示,登记处的数量、目的、结构和质量缺乏透明度。这至关重要,因为登记处作为早期预警系统,可识别和通知处于风险中的患者。