Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
BMJ Open. 2013 Sep 27;3(9):e003343. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003343.
In clinical trials of dabigatran and rivaroxaban for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF), drug eligibility and dosing were determined using the Cockcroft-Gault equation to estimate creatine clearance as a measure of renal function. This cross-sectional study aimed to compare whether using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) by the widely available and widely used Modified Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation would alter prescribing or dosing of the renally excreted new oral anticoagulants.
Of 4712 patients with known AF within a general practitioner-registered population of 930 079 in east London, data were available enabling renal function to be calculated by both Cockcroft-Gault and MDRD methods in 4120 (87.4%).
Of 4120 patients, 2706 were <80 years and 1414 were ≥80 years of age. Among those ≥80 years, 14.9% were ineligible for dabigatran according to Cockcroft-Gault equation but would have been judged eligible applying MDRD method. For those <80 years, 0.8% would have been incorrectly judged eligible for dabigatran and 5.3% would have received too high a dose. For rivaroxaban, 0.3% would have been incorrectly judged eligible for treatment and 13.5% would have received too high a dose.
Were the MDRD-derived eGFR to be used instead of Cockcroft-Gault in prescribing these new agents, many elderly patients with AF would either incorrectly become eligible for them or would receive too high a dose. Safety has not been established using the MDRD equation, a concern since the risk of major bleeding would be increased in patients with unsuspected renal impairment. Given the potentially widespread use of these agents, particularly in primary care, regulatory authorities and drug companies should alert UK doctors of the need to use the Cockcroft-Gault formula to calculate eligibility for and dosing of the new oral anticoagulants in elderly patients with AF and not rely on the MDRD-derived eGFR.
在达比加群和利伐沙班用于预防心房颤动(AF)中风的临床试验中,药物的适应证和剂量是通过 Cockcroft-Gault 方程来确定的,该方程估计肌酐清除率作为肾功能的指标。本横断面研究旨在比较使用更为常用的改良肾脏病膳食研究(MDRD)方程估算的肾小球滤过率(eGFR)是否会改变这些经肾脏排泄的新型口服抗凝剂的处方或剂量。
在伦敦东部一个有 930079 名全科医生注册人口的普通人群中,有 4712 名已知患有 AF 的患者,其中有 4120 名(87.4%)患者的数据可以同时通过 Cockcroft-Gault 和 MDRD 方法计算肾功能。
在 4120 名患者中,2706 名年龄<80 岁,1414 名年龄≥80 岁。在≥80 岁的患者中,根据 Cockcroft-Gault 方程,14.9%的患者不适用达比加群,但如果应用 MDRD 方法,则被判断为适用。对于<80 岁的患者,0.8%的患者会被错误地判断为适用达比加群,5.3%的患者会接受过高的剂量。对于利伐沙班,0.3%的患者会被错误地判断为适用治疗,13.5%的患者会接受过高的剂量。
如果在开具这些新型药物时使用 MDRD 衍生的 eGFR 而不是 Cockcroft-Gault,许多患有 AF 的老年患者要么会错误地获得适应证,要么会接受过高的剂量。使用 MDRD 方程并未确定安全性,因为在未发现肾损害的患者中,大出血的风险会增加。鉴于这些药物的广泛应用,尤其是在初级保健中,监管机构和制药公司应该提醒英国医生,需要使用 Cockcroft-Gault 公式来计算老年 AF 患者使用新型口服抗凝剂的适应证和剂量,而不是依赖 MDRD 衍生的 eGFR。