Suppr超能文献

透析患者二尖瓣手术方式的选择:二尖瓣修复是否影响结局?

Mitral procedure selection in patients on dialysis: does mitral repair influence outcomes?

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Ill.

Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Jul;148(1):144-150.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.08.006. Epub 2013 Oct 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the likelihood of mitral valve repair among dialysis patients and the influence of mitral procedure selection on surgical outcomes in this cohort.

METHODS

Among patients undergoing isolated primary mitral valve surgery in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (2002-2010), we used logistic regression models to evaluate the following: (1) the likelihood of attempted and successful mitral repair among dialysis patients (2008-2010), and (2) the impact of mitral procedural selection on surgical mortality and composite mortality/major morbidity experienced by dialysis patients (2002-2010). Patients with endocarditis and those undergoing emergent or major concomitant surgeries were excluded.

RESULTS

The study cohort consisted of 86,563 patients, of whom 1480 (1.7%) required preoperative dialysis. Dialysis patients had a high comorbid burden, including a high prevalence of congestive heart failure, stroke, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and prior myocardial infarction. Dialysis-dependent patients had a lower propensity for mitral repair (44.6% vs 61.5%; P = .0010; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-0.78); although the odds of successful repair (when attempted) were similar for dialysis versus nondialysis patients (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.65-1.17). Compared with nondialysis patients, dialysis patients experienced a higher mortality rate (9.3% vs 2.3%; P < .0001; adjusted OR, 3.91; 95% CI, 3.17-4.81) and composite mortality or major morbidity (40.9% vs 15.9%; P < .0001; adjusted OR, 2.72; 95% CI, 2.41-3.07); however, adjustment for procedure selection did not substantially attenuate this effect (2.3% and 2.1% change-in-estimate for mortality and composite mortality/major morbidity, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Dialysis patients undergo mitral repair less frequently, although repair success is equally likely when attempted among dialysis versus nondialysis patients. Dialysis-dependent renal failure is associated strongly with early mortality and major morbidity. However, procedure selection (repair vs replacement) does not appear to have a clinically meaningful impact on these short-term outcomes.

摘要

目的

研究透析患者二尖瓣修复的可能性,以及该队列中二尖瓣手术方式选择对手术结果的影响。

方法

在胸外科医师学会成人心脏手术数据库(2002-2010 年)中,我们对接受单纯二尖瓣手术的患者进行了研究,使用逻辑回归模型评估了以下内容:(1)2008-2010 年期间,透析患者尝试和成功进行二尖瓣修复的可能性;(2)2002-2010 年期间,二尖瓣手术方式选择对透析患者手术死亡率和死亡率/主要并发症发生率的影响。排除了患有心内膜炎和接受急诊或主要合并手术的患者。

结果

研究队列包括 86563 名患者,其中 1480 名(1.7%)需要术前透析。透析患者有很高的合并症负担,包括充血性心力衰竭、中风、糖尿病、外周血管疾病、慢性阻塞性肺疾病和既往心肌梗死的高发率。依赖透析的患者进行二尖瓣修复的可能性较低(44.6%比 61.5%;P=0.0010;调整后的比值比[OR],0.69;95%置信区间[CI],0.61-0.78);尽管透析与非透析患者尝试修复的成功率相似(OR,0.87;95%CI,0.65-1.17)。与非透析患者相比,透析患者的死亡率更高(9.3%比 2.3%;P<0.0001;调整后的 OR,3.91;95%CI,3.17-4.81)和死亡率/主要并发症发生率更高(40.9%比 15.9%;P<0.0001;调整后的 OR,2.72;95%CI,2.41-3.07);然而,对手术方式选择的调整并没有显著减弱这种影响(死亡率和死亡率/主要并发症发生率的估计值分别变化了 2.3%和 2.1%)。

结论

透析患者进行二尖瓣修复的频率较低,尽管在尝试进行二尖瓣修复时,透析患者与非透析患者的成功率相似。依赖透析的肾功能衰竭与早期死亡率和主要并发症密切相关。然而,手术方式(修复与置换)似乎对这些短期结果没有明显的临床意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验