Silvano M, Corrado D, Köbe J, Mönnig G, Basso C, Thiene G, Eckardt L
Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Sciences, University of Padova Medical School, Padova, Italy.
Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2013 Dec;24(4):202-8. doi: 10.1007/s00399-013-0291-5. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is a genetic cardiomyopathy characterized by myocyte death and fibrofatty replacement mostly in the right ventricle. It is a leading cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in individuals under the age of 35 years. The main goal in the treatment of the disease is the prevention of SCD. An implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is the only proven life-saving therapeutic option able to improve survival in ARVC patients. This therapy is not free from side effects and it accounts for a relatively high rate of morbidity because of the occurrence of inappropriate ICD interventions and of complications, both at implantation and during the follow-up. In recent years, the approach to ICD implantation has been changing on the basis of new emerging data on risk stratification. The usefulness of ICD implantation for secondary prevention has been definitively proven; the most challenging question is how to treat patients with no history of previous cardiac arrest or hemodynamically unstable ventricular tachycardia (VT). The value of ECG abnormalities, syncope, VT, and right/left ventricular involvement as predictors of SCD has been assessed in different studies with the purpose of better defining risk stratification in ARVC. Nevertheless, in spite of the growing amount of data, primary prevention in ARVC patients remains mostly an individual decision.
致心律失常性右室心肌病(ARVC)是一种遗传性心肌病,其特征是主要在右心室出现心肌细胞死亡和纤维脂肪替代。它是35岁以下个体心源性猝死(SCD)的主要原因。该疾病治疗的主要目标是预防SCD。植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)是唯一经证实的能够提高ARVC患者生存率的挽救生命的治疗选择。这种治疗并非没有副作用,并且由于不适当的ICD干预以及植入和随访期间并发症的发生,其发病率相对较高。近年来,基于新出现的风险分层数据,ICD植入方法一直在发生变化。ICD植入用于二级预防的有效性已得到明确证实;最具挑战性的问题是如何治疗既往无心脏骤停或血流动力学不稳定室性心动过速(VT)病史的患者。在不同研究中评估了心电图异常、晕厥、VT以及右/左心室受累作为SCD预测指标的价值,目的是更好地确定ARVC的风险分层。然而,尽管数据量不断增加,ARVC患者的一级预防在很大程度上仍然是个体化决策。