Suppr超能文献

儿童慢性腹痛中肠病检测的提供者间差异。

Interprovider variation of celiac disease testing in childhood chronic abdominal pain.

机构信息

Section of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

BMC Gastroenterol. 2013 Oct 14;13:150. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-13-150.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To determine within one tertiary care center: 1) the variation between providers in testing for celiac disease in children with chronic abdominal pain; 2) the characteristics of those children who were more likely to be tested, and 3) the prevalence of celiac disease in those evaluated.

METHODS

Retrospective review of children with a primary complaint of chronic abdominal pain referred to a tertiary care children's hospital for pediatric gastroenterology evaluation over a 2-year period was conducted. Children with at least two visits and without an identified organic etiology for the pain were included.

RESULTS

160 children were evaluated by 16 pediatric gastroenterologists and one nurse practitioner. Celiac serologic testing was completed in 63 (39.4%) children. There was no significant variance in the frequency of celiac serologic testing between providers. Child age, gender, body mass index, and baseline gastrointestinal symptoms did not predict whether celiac serologic testing occurred, though Caucasians (P < 0.01) were more likely to be tested. Eighty-two (51.3%) children underwent either serologic testing and/or esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Four (4.9%, 95% CI: 1.6-11.3%) of the 82 tested were diagnosed with celiac disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Though interprovider variation for celiac disease testing in children with chronic abdominal pain did not occur, a large number of these children were not evaluated for celiac disease. Children's race/ethnicity but not their associated gastrointestinal symptoms predicted whether celiac testing was undertaken. In those tested, celiac disease was identified in a higher percentage than that expected in the general population.

摘要

背景

在一家三级保健中心内确定:1)在对慢性腹痛儿童进行乳糜泻检测方面,提供者之间的差异;2)更有可能接受检测的儿童的特征;3)评估中乳糜泻的患病率。

方法

对在两年期间因慢性腹痛向三级保健儿童医院小儿胃肠病学就诊的儿童进行了回顾性分析。纳入了至少两次就诊且腹痛无明确器质性病因的儿童。

结果

160 名儿童由 16 名小儿胃肠病学家和一名护士从业者进行了评估。对 63 名(39.4%)儿童完成了乳糜泻血清学检测。提供者之间进行乳糜泻血清学检测的频率没有明显差异。儿童年龄、性别、体重指数和基线胃肠道症状并不能预测是否进行乳糜泻血清学检测,但白种人(P <0.01)更有可能接受检测。82 名(51.3%)儿童进行了血清学检测和/或食管胃十二指肠镜检查。在 82 名接受检测的儿童中,有 4 名(4.9%,95%CI:1.6-11.3%)被诊断为乳糜泻。

结论

尽管对慢性腹痛儿童进行乳糜泻检测的提供者之间存在差异,但仍有大量此类儿童未接受乳糜泻检测。儿童的种族/族裔但不是其相关的胃肠道症状预测了是否进行乳糜泻检测。在接受检测的儿童中,乳糜泻的检出率高于一般人群的预期值。

相似文献

4
Recurrent abdominal pain in children: underlying pathologies in the absence of "alarm" symptoms.
Minerva Pediatr. 2017 Aug;69(4):239-244. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4946.16.04247-X. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
7
REVIEW OF CELIAC DISEASE PRESENTATION IN A PEDIATRIC TERTIARY CENTRE.儿科三级医疗中心乳糜泻临床表现综述
Arq Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan-Mar;55(1):86-93. doi: 10.1590/S0004-2803.201800000-17.
8
Screening for celiac disease in children with recurrent abdominal pain.对复发性腹痛儿童进行乳糜泻筛查。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2001 Sep;33(3):250-2. doi: 10.1097/00005176-200109000-00004.

本文引用的文献

1
ACG clinical guidelines: diagnosis and management of celiac disease.ACG 临床指南:乳糜泻的诊断和管理。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 May;108(5):656-76; quiz 677. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.79. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
2
The prevalence of celiac disease in the United States.美国的乳糜泻患病率。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Oct;107(10):1538-44; quiz 1537, 1545. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.219. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
5
A million-dollar work-up for abdominal pain: is it worth it?为腹痛进行价值百万美元的检查:值得吗?
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2010 Nov;51(5):579-83. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181de0639.
6
Pediatric celiac disease.小儿乳糜泻。
Curr Opin Pediatr. 2009 Oct;21(5):655-60. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e32832f5b9d.
10
Characteristics of pain and stooling in children with recurrent abdominal pain.复发性腹痛患儿的疼痛及排便特点
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2007 Feb;44(2):203-8. doi: 10.1097/01.mpg.0000243437.39710.c0.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验