Suppr超能文献

生物样本库伦理的“镜像”:我们应从同意书分析中学到什么[已修正]?

'Mirroring' the ethics of biobanking: what should we learn from the analysis of consent documents[corrected]?

作者信息

Serepkaite Jurate, Valuckiene Zivile, Gefenas Eugenijus

出版信息

Sci Eng Ethics. 2014 Dec;20(4):1079-93. doi: 10.1007/s11948-013-9481-0. Epub 2013 Oct 18.

Abstract

Biobanks have been recognized as a key research infrastructure and how to approach ethical questions has been a topic of discussion for at least a decade by now. This article explores the characteristics of donors' participation in European biobanks as reflected in the consent documents of a selection of different biobanks from various European countries. The primary aim of this study is to understand how donors are informed about their participation in biobanking. Also the paper discusses what the most important thematic issues of information are to be given to the biobank participants and how this information should be presented in the consent documents. For these purposes, we analyse consent documents from 14 biobanks in 11 countries for six ethically relevant issues: (1) model of consent, (2) scope of future research, (3) access to medical data, (4) feedback to the participants, (5) consent withdrawal, and (6) role of research ethics committee. In order to compare different trends of informing donors of human biological material and medical data, we interpret the six analysed issues in the context of respect to donor's autonomy paradigm. Although the results of the paper reflect the heterogeneity of biobank consent document policies applied in different European countries, we uncovered some trends and suggested several examples of good practices to balance the interests of the donors with those of the researchers and future patients.

摘要

生物样本库已被视为关键的研究基础设施,而如何处理伦理问题至今至少已成为讨论了十年的话题。本文探讨了捐赠者参与欧洲生物样本库的特点,这些特点反映在从欧洲不同国家选取的一些不同生物样本库的知情同意文件中。本研究的主要目的是了解捐赠者是如何得知自己参与生物样本库相关事宜的。此外,本文还讨论了向生物样本库参与者提供信息时最重要的主题问题有哪些,以及这些信息应如何在知情同意文件中呈现。出于这些目的,我们分析了来自11个国家14个生物样本库的知情同意文件,涉及六个与伦理相关的问题:(1)同意模式;(2)未来研究的范围;(3)获取医疗数据;(4)向参与者反馈;(5)撤回同意;(6)研究伦理委员会的作用。为了比较在告知捐赠者人类生物材料和医疗数据方面的不同趋势,我们在尊重捐赠者自主范式的背景下解读这六个分析问题。尽管本文的结果反映了欧洲不同国家应用的生物样本库知情同意文件政策的异质性,但我们发现了一些趋势,并提出了几个良好做法的示例,以平衡捐赠者与研究人员及未来患者的利益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验