Suppr超能文献

基于证据的 2 型糖尿病心肌梗死预防共享决策方案:一项随机对照试验方案。

An evidence-based shared decision making programme on the prevention of myocardial infarction in type 2 diabetes: protocol of a randomised-controlled trial.

机构信息

Unit of Health Sciences and Education, Hamburg University, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Oct 19;14:155. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-155.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lack of patient involvement in decision making has been suggested as one reason for limited treatment success. Concepts such as shared decision making may contribute to high quality healthcare by supporting patients to make informed decisions together with their physicians.A multi-component shared decision making programme on the prevention of heart attack in type 2 diabetes has been developed. It aims at improving the quality of decision-making by providing evidence-based patient information, enhancing patients' knowledge, and supporting them to actively participate in decision-making. In this study the efficacy of the programme is evaluated in the setting of a diabetes clinic.

METHODS/DESIGN: A single blinded randomised-controlled trial is conducted to compare the shared decision making programme with a control-intervention. The intervention consists of an evidence-based patient decision aid on the prevention of myocardial infarction and a corresponding counselling module provided by diabetes educators. Similar in duration and structure, the control-intervention targets nutrition, sports, and stress coping. A total of 154 patients between 40 and 69 years of age with type 2 diabetes and no previous diagnosis of ischaemic heart disease or stroke are enrolled and allocated either to the intervention or the control-intervention. Primary outcome measure is the patients' knowledge on benefits and harms of heart attack prevention captured by a standardised knowledge test. Key secondary outcome measure is the achievement of treatment goals prioritised by the individual patient. Treatment goals refer to statin taking, HbA1c-, blood pressure levels and smoking status. Outcomes are assessed directly after the counselling and at 6 months follow-up. Analyses will be carried out on intention-to-treat basis. Concurrent qualitative methods are used to explore intervention fidelity and to gain insight into implementation processes.

DISCUSSION

Interventions to facilitate evidence-based shared decision making represent an innovative approach in diabetes care. The results of this study will provide information on the efficacy of such a concept in the setting of a diabetes clinic in Germany.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN84636255.

摘要

背景

缺乏患者参与决策被认为是治疗效果有限的原因之一。诸如共同决策等概念可以通过支持患者与医生一起做出明智的决策,为高质量的医疗保健做出贡献。已经开发了一种多组件的 2 型糖尿病预防心脏病发作的共同决策方案。它旨在通过提供基于证据的患者信息、增强患者的知识,并支持他们积极参与决策,来提高决策质量。在这项研究中,该方案在糖尿病诊所的环境中进行了评估。

方法/设计:一项单盲随机对照试验比较了共同决策方案与对照干预。干预措施包括基于证据的心肌梗死预防患者决策辅助工具和由糖尿病教育工作者提供的相应咨询模块。干预和对照干预的持续时间和结构相似,针对营养、运动和压力应对。共招募了 154 名年龄在 40 至 69 岁之间、患有 2 型糖尿病且无缺血性心脏病或中风既往诊断的患者,并将其分配到干预组或对照组。主要结局测量是通过标准化知识测试捕获的患者对预防心脏病发作的益处和危害的知识。次要关键结局测量是实现患者个人优先的治疗目标。治疗目标是指他汀类药物、HbA1c、血压水平和吸烟状况。在咨询后和 6 个月随访时直接评估结果。分析将基于意向治疗进行。同时采用定性方法来探索干预的忠实度,并深入了解实施过程。

讨论

促进基于证据的共同决策的干预措施代表了糖尿病护理的创新方法。本研究的结果将提供有关此类概念在德国糖尿病诊所环境中的效果的信息。

试验注册

ISRCTN84636255。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc13/4016600/ee6a0eb91024/1471-2296-14-155-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验