BSc, MBBS, MRCPCH, Neonatal ICU, Box 402, Rosie Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
Pediatrics. 2013 Nov;132(5):841-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-1686. Epub 2013 Oct 21.
Therapeutic hypothermia is now the standard of care for hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Treatment should be started early, and it is often necessary to transfer the infant to a regional NICU for ongoing care. There are no large studies reporting outcomes from infants cooled passively compared with active (servo-controlled) cooling during transfer. Our goal was to review data from a regional transport service, comparing both methods of cooling.
This was a retrospective observational study of 143 infants referred to a regional NICU for ongoing therapeutic hypothermia. Of the 134 infants transferred, the first 64 were cooled passively, and 70 were subsequently cooled after purchase of a servo-controlled mattress. Key outcome measures were time to arrival at the regional unit, temperature at referral and arrival at the regional unit, and temperature stability during transfer.
The age cooling was started was significantly shorter in the actively cooled group (46 [0-352] minutes vs 120 [0-502] minutes; P <.01). The median (range) stabilization time (153 [60-385] minutes vs 133 [45-505] minutes; P = .04) and age at arrival at the regional unit (504 [191-924] minutes vs 452 [225-1265]) minutes; P = .01) were significantly shorter in the actively cooled group. Only 39% of infants passively cooled were within the target temperature range at arrival to the regional unit compared with 100% actively cooled.
Servo-controlled active cooling has been shown to improve temperature stability and is associated with a reduction in transfer time.
治疗性低温现在是缺氧缺血性脑病的标准治疗方法。治疗应尽早开始,通常需要将婴儿转至区域性新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)进行持续治疗。目前尚无大型研究报告在转运过程中比较被动冷却与主动(伺服控制)冷却的婴儿结局。我们的目标是回顾区域性转运服务的数据,比较这两种冷却方式。
这是一项回顾性观察性研究,纳入了 143 例转至区域性 NICU 进行持续治疗性低温的婴儿。在 134 例转运的婴儿中,前 64 例采用被动冷却,随后在购买伺服控制床垫后对 70 例进行冷却。主要结局指标为到达区域性单位的时间、转院前和到达区域性单位时的体温,以及转运过程中的体温稳定性。
主动冷却组开始冷却的年龄明显更短(46[0-352]分钟比 120[0-502]分钟;P<0.01)。稳定时间(中位数[范围],153[60-385]分钟比 133[45-505]分钟;P=0.04)和到达区域性单位的年龄(中位数[范围],504[191-924]分钟比 452[225-1265]分钟;P=0.01)也明显更短。与主动冷却组相比,仅 39%的被动冷却婴儿在到达区域性单位时的体温处于目标范围内,而主动冷却组则为 100%。
伺服控制主动冷却已被证明可提高体温稳定性,并与转运时间的缩短相关。