Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University of Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany,
Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2013 Dec;8(4):333-41. doi: 10.1007/s11899-013-0186-x.
Although the revised World Health Organization (WHO) criteria for the diagnosis and classification of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) were defined by a panel of expert hematopathologists and clinicians, controversy has been repeatedly expressed questioning the clinical usefulness and reproducibility of these diagnostic guidelines. In particular, the distinction between essential thrombocythemia (ET), early/prefibrotic primary myelofibrosis (PMF) and initial stages of polycythemia vera (PV) is still a matter of debate. In this context, it has been argued that clinical correlations with histological features were not firmly substantiated. On the other hand, recently published data from independently performed studies have repeatedly validated the reproducibility of the WHO criteria and provided persuasive evidence that discrimination of early/prefibrotic PMF has a significant impact on the risk of myelofibrotic and leukemic transformation. However, as has been explicitly required, the WHO concept is based on the recognition of characteristic bone marrow patterns and a consensus of clinical and molecular data.
尽管世界卫生组织(WHO)修订的骨髓增殖性肿瘤(MPN)的诊断和分类标准是由一组血液病理学家和临床专家定义的,但人们反复表达了对这些诊断指南的临床实用性和可重复性的质疑。特别是,特发性血小板增多症(ET)、早期/纤维化前期原发性骨髓纤维化(PMF)和真性红细胞增多症(PV)初始阶段之间的区别仍然存在争议。在这种情况下,有人认为与组织学特征的临床相关性没有得到充分证实。另一方面,最近发表的独立研究数据反复验证了 WHO 标准的可重复性,并提供了有说服力的证据,表明早期/纤维化前期 PMF 的鉴别对骨髓纤维化和白血病转化的风险有重大影响。然而,正如明确要求的那样,WHO 的概念基于对特征性骨髓模式的识别和临床及分子数据的共识。