Niemansburg Sophie L, Teraa Martin, Hesam Husna, van Delden Johannes J M, Verhaar Marianne C, Bredenoord Annelien L
1 Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center, University Medical Center Utercht , The Netherlands .
Tissue Eng Part A. 2014 Oct;20(19-20):2567-74. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2013.0332. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
Stem cell-based interventions provide new treatment prospects for many disease conditions, including cardiovascular disorders. Clinical trials are necessary to collect adequate evidence on (long-term) safety and efficacy of novel interventions such as stem cells, but the design and launch of clinical trials, from first-in-human studies to larger randomized controlled trials (RCTs), is scientifically and ethically challenging. Stem cells are different from traditional pharmaceuticals, surgical procedures, and medical devices in the following ways: the novelty and complexity of stem cells, the invasiveness of the procedures, and the novel aim of regeneration. These specifics, combined with the characteristics of the study population, will have an impact on the design and ethics of RCTs. The recently closed JUVENTAS trial will serve as an example to identify the (interwoven) scientific and ethical challenges in the design and launch of stem cell RCTs. The JUVENTAS trial has investigated the efficacy of autologous bone marrow cells in end-stage vascular patients, in a double-blind sham-controlled design. We first describe the choices, considerations, and experiences of the JUVENTAS team. Subsequently, we identify the main ethical and scientific challenges and discuss what is important to consider in the design of future stem cell RCTs: assessment of risks and benefits, the choice for outcome measures, the choice for the comparator, the appropriate selection of participants, and adequate informed consent. Additionally, the stem cell field is highly in the spotlight due to the (commercial) interests and expectations. This warrants a cautious pace of translation and scrupulous set up of clinical trials, as failures could put the field in a negative light. At the same time, knowledge from clinical trials is necessary for the field to progress. We conclude that in the scientifically and ethically challenging field of stem cell RCTs, researchers and clinicians have to maneuver between the Skylla of hyper accelerated translation without rigorously conducted RCTs and the Charybdis of the missed opportunity of valuable knowledge.
基于干细胞的干预措施为包括心血管疾病在内的许多疾病状况提供了新的治疗前景。进行临床试验以收集关于干细胞等新型干预措施(长期)安全性和有效性的充分证据是必要的,但从首次人体研究到更大规模的随机对照试验(RCT),临床试验的设计和开展在科学和伦理方面都具有挑战性。干细胞在以下方面不同于传统药物、外科手术和医疗设备:干细胞的新颖性和复杂性、操作的侵入性以及再生这一新颖目标。这些特性,再加上研究人群的特点,将对RCT的设计和伦理产生影响。最近结束的JUVENTAS试验将作为一个例子,以识别干细胞RCT设计和开展过程中(相互交织的)科学和伦理挑战。JUVENTAS试验采用双盲假对照设计,研究了自体骨髓细胞在终末期血管疾病患者中的疗效。我们首先描述JUVENTAS团队的选择、考量因素和经验。随后,我们识别主要的伦理和科学挑战,并讨论在未来干细胞RCT设计中需要考虑的重要因素:风险和益处评估、结局指标的选择、对照物的选择、参与者的适当选择以及充分的知情同意。此外,由于(商业)利益和期望,干细胞领域备受关注。这就需要谨慎推进转化并严谨地开展临床试验,因为试验失败可能会给该领域带来负面影响。与此同时,临床试验的知识对于该领域的发展是必要的。我们得出结论,在科学和伦理方面都具有挑战性的干细胞RCT领域,研究人员和临床医生必须在未经严格RCT的超快速转化的斯库拉(危险)和错过宝贵知识机会的卡律布狄斯(危险)之间小心行事。