Suppr超能文献

乳腺细针穿刺结果不确定或有误但材料充足且具有代表性:一项细胞学/组织学研究

Inconclusive or erroneous fine-needle aspirates of breast with adequate and representative material: a cytologic/histologic study.

作者信息

Shabb Nina S, Boulos Fouad I, Chakhachiro Zaher, Abbas Jaber, Abdul-Karim Fadi W

机构信息

Department of Pathology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.

出版信息

Diagn Cytopathol. 2014 May;42(5):405-15. doi: 10.1002/dc.23054. Epub 2013 Oct 25.

Abstract

Adequately cellular and representative fine-needle aspirates (FNAs) of breast have a high diagnostic accuracy. There is, however, a recognized category designated as "gray zone" where a definitive diagnosis cannot be reached. We reviewed our experience in this category to identify useful diagnostic parameters. Twenty-four such FNAs with surgical follow-up were retrieved from AUBMC files (2003-2009). Cytology slides were reviewed blindly. All cases were females, 29-73 years. There were three erroneous and 21 inconclusive diagnoses. The majority (15) was invasive adenocarcinomas: two cribriform, four tubular, one lobular, and eight not otherwise specified. The remaining cases were papillary and fibroepithelial tumors (three each), ductal carcinoma in situ, cribriform (two), and one adenomyoepithelioma (AME). Useful diagnostic features included: (1) Biphasic cell population with focal nuclear atypia and intranuclear and cytoplasmic vacuolar inclusions (AME). (2) Complex clusters of epithelial cells with cribriform architecture (cribriform carcinoma). (3) Rigid tubular epithelial structures with abrupt change in diameter, ending in pointed tips with abnormal branching (tubular carcinoma). (4) Cellular stromal fragments (fibroepithelial tumors). (5) Papillary fibrovascular cores, columnar cells, and three-dimensional papillary epithelial fragments (papillary tumors). Myoepithelial cells classically described in benign aspirates were not always a discriminatory factor. The "gray zone" in breast FNA is usually due to overlapping cytologic features of some benign and malignant lesions. Useful distinguishing cytologic features are described.

摘要

细胞成分充足且具有代表性的乳腺细针穿刺抽吸物(FNA)具有较高的诊断准确性。然而,存在一个被认可的“灰色地带”类别,在此类别中无法做出明确诊断。我们回顾了我们在这一类别中的经验,以确定有用的诊断参数。从AUBMC档案(2003 - 2009年)中检索出24例有手术随访结果的此类FNA。对细胞学玻片进行了盲法复查。所有病例均为女性,年龄在29至73岁之间。有3例假性诊断和21例不确定诊断。大多数(15例)为浸润性腺癌:2例筛状癌、4例管状癌、1例小叶癌和8例未另行分类的癌。其余病例为乳头状瘤和纤维上皮性肿瘤(各3例)、导管原位癌、筛状癌(2例)和1例腺肌上皮瘤(AME)。有用的诊断特征包括:(1)具有局灶性核异型性以及核内和胞质内空泡状包涵体的双相细胞群(AME)。(2)具有筛状结构的复杂上皮细胞簇(筛状癌)。(3)直径突然改变、末端为尖状且有异常分支的刚性管状上皮结构(管状癌)。(4)细胞性间质碎片(纤维上皮性肿瘤)。(5)乳头状纤维血管轴心、柱状细胞和三维乳头状上皮碎片(乳头状肿瘤)。良性抽吸物中经典描述的肌上皮细胞并不总是一个鉴别因素。乳腺FNA中的“灰色地带”通常是由于一些良性和恶性病变的细胞学特征重叠所致。本文描述了有用的鉴别细胞学特征。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验