Suppr超能文献

芬兰颞下颌关节紊乱症疼痛患者筛查中的研究诊断标准轴II及作为生物心理社会亚型分类的一部分

Research Diagnostic Criteria Axis II in screening and as a part of biopsychosocial subtyping of Finnish patients with temporomandibular disorder pain.

作者信息

Suvinen Tuija I, Kemppainen Pentti, Le Bell Yrsa, Valjakka Anna, Vahlberg Tero, Forssell Heli

出版信息

J Orofac Pain. 2013 Fall;27(4):314-24. doi: 10.11607/jop.1145.

Abstract

AIMS

To assess Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) Axis II variables in an initial psychosocial screening and as a part of biopsychosocial subtyping of Finnish referral patients with TMD pain for adjunct multidisciplinary assessment.

METHODS

Consecutive Finnish referral patients with TMD pain (n = 135) participated in this questionnaire-based survey. Psychosocial screening was based on Graded Chronic Pain Scale (GCPS) and culturally adjusted Symptom Checklist 90-revised (SCL-90R) depression scale scores and subtyping on GCPS pain-related interference in accordance with previous treatment tailoring studies. Biopsychosocial subtyping variables included symptoms of depression and somatization, general health, pain-related worry, sleep dysfunction, and coping ability. Subtype comparisons were analyzed with Bonferroni adjusted P values and multivariable logistic regression (SAS 9.3).

RESULTS

Based on psychosocial screening, 44% of the patients were psychosocially uncompromised (TMD subtype 1), 33% moderately, and 23% severely compromised (TMD subtypes 2 and 3). Compared to TMD subtype 1, TMD subtype 2 patients reported intermediate scores, and the most vulnerable TMD subtype 3 had the poorest general health, most elevated depression, somatization, worry and sleep dysfunction, and poor coping ability (P < .05). According to multivariable logistic regression, depression and worry levels were significantly higher in TMD subtype 3 compared to TMD subtype 1, whilst patients in TMD subtypes 1 and 2 reported significantly better coping ability compared to TMD subtype 3 (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

The Finnish RDC/TMD Axis II was found reliable in initial TMD pain patient screening and with further biopsychosocial assessment identified three main TMD subtypes, two with compromised psychosocial profiles for adjunct multidisciplinary assessment.

摘要

目的

评估颞下颌关节紊乱病研究诊断标准(RDC/TMD)轴II变量在初始心理社会筛查中以及作为芬兰颞下颌关节紊乱病疼痛转诊患者生物心理社会分型的一部分,用于辅助多学科评估的情况。

方法

连续纳入135例有颞下颌关节紊乱病疼痛的芬兰转诊患者参与这项基于问卷的调查。心理社会筛查基于分级慢性疼痛量表(GCPS)以及文化调整后的症状自评量表90修订版(SCL - 90R)抑郁量表评分,分型则依据GCPS疼痛相关干扰情况,与既往治疗调整研究一致。生物心理社会分型变量包括抑郁和躯体化症状、总体健康状况、疼痛相关担忧、睡眠功能障碍和应对能力。采用Bonferroni校正P值和多变量逻辑回归(SAS 9.3)分析亚型间差异。

结果

基于心理社会筛查,44%的患者心理社会功能未受影响(颞下颌关节紊乱病亚型1),33%为中度受影响,23%为重度受影响(颞下颌关节紊乱病亚型2和3)。与颞下颌关节紊乱病亚型1相比,颞下颌关节紊乱病亚型2患者报告的分数居中,最脆弱的颞下颌关节紊乱病亚型3总体健康状况最差,抑郁、躯体化、担忧和睡眠功能障碍程度最高,应对能力最差(P <.05)。根据多变量逻辑回归,与颞下颌关节紊乱病亚型1相比,颞下颌关节紊乱病亚型3的抑郁和担忧水平显著更高,而颞下颌关节紊乱病亚型1和2的患者报告的应对能力明显优于颞下颌关节紊乱病亚型3(P <.05)。

结论

发现芬兰RDC/TMD轴II在初始颞下颌关节紊乱病疼痛患者筛查中可靠,且通过进一步的生物心理社会评估确定了三种主要的颞下颌关节紊乱病亚型,其中两种心理社会状况受损,可用于辅助多学科评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验