Department of Genetics, The Alexander Silberman Life Sciences Institute, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 91904, Jerusalem, Israel.
Theor Appl Genet. 1994 Oct;89(2-3):351-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00225166.
The cost of experiments aimed at determining linkage between marker loci and quantitative trait loci (QTL) was investigated as a function of marker spacing and number of individuals scored. It was found that for a variety of experimental designs, fairly wide marker spacings (ca. 50 cM) are optimum or close to optimum for initial studies of marker-QTL linkage, in the sense of minimizing overall cost of the experiment. Thus, even when large numbers of more or less evenly spaced markers are available, it will not always be cost effective to make full utilization of this capacity. This is particularly true when costs of rearing and trait evaluation per individual scored are low, as when marker data are obtained on individuals raised and evaluated for quantitative traits as part of existing programs. When costs of rearing and trait evaluation per individual scored are high, however, as in human family data collection carried out primarily for subsequent marker - QTL analyses, or when plants or animals are raised specifically for purposes of marker - QTL linkage experiments, optimum spacing may be rather narrow. It is noteworthy that when marginal costs of additional markers or individuals are constant, total resources allocated to a given experiment will determine total number of individuals sampled, but not the optimal marker spacing.
研究了旨在确定标记基因座与数量性状基因座(QTL)之间连锁的实验成本,其取决于标记间距和评分个体数量。结果发现,对于各种实验设计,相当宽的标记间距(约 50cM)对于标记-QTL 连锁的初始研究是最佳或接近最佳的,因为这样可以最大限度地降低实验的总体成本。因此,即使有大量或多或少均匀分布的标记可用,也不一定总能从这种能力中获得成本效益。当每个评分个体的饲养和性状评估成本较低时,尤其是当标记数据是作为现有计划的一部分在提高和评估数量性状的个体上获得时,情况尤其如此。然而,当每个评分个体的饲养和性状评估成本较高时,例如主要用于随后的标记-QTL 分析的人类家族数据收集,或者当植物或动物是为了标记-QTL 连锁实验的目的而专门饲养时,最佳间距可能会相当窄。值得注意的是,当额外标记或个体的边际成本保持不变时,分配给特定实验的总资源将决定采样的个体总数,但不会影响最佳标记间距。