Sarapas Casey, Katz Andrea C, Nelson Brady D, Campbell Miranda L, Bishop Jeffrey R, Robison-Andrew E Jenna, Altman Sarah E, Gorka Stephanie M, Shankman Stewart A
a Department of Psychology , University of Illinois at Chicago , Chicago , IL , USA.
Cogn Emot. 2014;28(4):636-55. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2013.848787. Epub 2013 Nov 6.
Appetitive and defensive motivation account for a good deal of variance in personality and mental health, but whether individual differences in these systems are correlated or orthogonal has not been conclusively established. Previous investigations have generally relied on self-report and have yielded conflicting results. We therefore assessed the relation between psychophysiological indices of appetitive and defensive motivation during elicitation of these motivational states: specifically, frontal electroencephalogram asymmetry during reward anticipation and startle response during anticipation of predictable or unpredictable threat of shock. Results in a sample of psychopathology-free community members (n=63), an independent sample of undergraduates with a range of internalising symptoms (n=64), and the combination of these samples (n=127) revealed that differences in responding to the two tasks were not significantly correlated. Average coefficients approached zero in all three samples (community: .04, undergraduate: -.01, combined: .06). Implications of these findings for research on normal and abnormal personality are discussed.
寻求动机和防御动机在很大程度上解释了人格和心理健康方面的差异,但这些系统中的个体差异是相互关联还是相互独立,尚未得到最终确定。以往的研究通常依赖于自我报告,结果相互矛盾。因此,我们在诱发这些动机状态时评估了寻求动机和防御动机的心理生理指标之间的关系:具体而言,在奖励预期期间的额叶脑电图不对称性,以及在预期可预测或不可预测的电击威胁期间的惊跳反应。来自无精神病理学的社区成员样本(n = 63)、具有一系列内化症状的本科生独立样本(n = 64)以及这些样本的组合(n = 127)的结果表明,对这两项任务的反应差异没有显著相关性。在所有三个样本中,平均系数均接近零(社区样本:0.04,本科生样本:-0.01,合并样本:0.06)。本文讨论了这些发现对正常和异常人格研究的意义。