Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Barts and The School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
BMJ Open. 2013 Nov 14;3(11):e003534. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003534.
To devise and test a self-management course for chronic pain patients based on evidence and underpinned by theory using the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework for developing complex interventions.
We used a mixed method approach. We conducted a systematic review of the effectiveness of components and characteristics of pain management courses. We then interviewed chronic pain patients who had attended pain and self-management courses. Behavioural change theories were mapped onto our findings and used to design the intervention. We then conducted a feasibility study to test the intervention.
Primary care in the inner city of London, UK.
Adults (18 years or older) with chronic musculoskeletal pain.
Related disability, quality of life, coping, depression, anxiety, social integration and healthcare resource use.
The systematic reviews indicated that group-based courses with joint lay and healthcare professional leadership and that included a psychological component of short duration (<8 weeks) showed considerable promise. The qualitative research indicated that participants liked relaxation, valued social interaction and course location, and that timing and good tutoring were important determinants of attendance. We used behavioural change theories (social learning theory and cognitive behaviour approaches (CBA)) to inform course content. The course addressed: understanding and accepting pain, mood and pain, unhelpful thoughts and behaviour, problem solving, goal setting, action planning, movement, relaxation and social integration/reactivation. Attendance was 85%; we modified the recruitment of patients, the course and the training of facilitators as a result of testing.
The MRC guidelines were helpful in developing this intervention. It was possible to train both lay and non-psychologists to facilitate the courses and deliver CBA. The course was feasible and well received.
根据循证医学和理论,利用医学研究委员会(MRC)制定复杂干预措施的框架,为慢性疼痛患者设计并测试一个自我管理课程。
我们采用混合方法。我们对疼痛管理课程的组成部分和特征的有效性进行了系统评价。然后,我们采访了参加过疼痛和自我管理课程的慢性疼痛患者。将行为改变理论映射到我们的研究结果上,并用于设计干预措施。然后,我们进行了一项可行性研究来测试干预措施。
英国伦敦市中心的初级保健。
患有慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的成年人(18 岁或以上)。
相关残疾、生活质量、应对、抑郁、焦虑、社会融合和医疗资源使用。
系统评价表明,由非专业人员和医疗保健专业人员联合领导的小组课程,以及包括短期(<8 周)心理成分的课程具有很大的潜力。定性研究表明,参与者喜欢放松,重视社交互动和课程地点,并且时间安排和良好的辅导是出勤率的重要决定因素。我们使用行为改变理论(社会学习理论和认知行为方法(CBA))来告知课程内容。该课程涉及:了解和接受疼痛、情绪和疼痛、无益的想法和行为、解决问题、设定目标、制定行动计划、运动、放松和社会融合/再激活。出勤率为 85%;我们修改了患者的招募方式、课程和辅导员的培训,以适应测试结果。
MRC 指南在制定该干预措施方面很有帮助。可以培训非专业人员和非心理学家来帮助课程和提供 CBA。该课程是可行的,并且受到了好评。