Stirner Beatrice, Thangaraj Harry
Institute of Health Law, University of Neuchâtel, Avenue du 1er Mars 26, 2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Pharm Pat Anal. 2013 Mar;2(2):195-213. doi: 10.4155/ppa.12.91.
Compulsory license is one of the safeguards that international IP law provides to address the undesired effects of pharmaceutical patents on access to important medicines. This article looks into three important case examples to analyze the mechanism's effectiveness and feasibility: the first uses of the newer compulsory license regime established in 2003 under the WTO legislative framework to export medicines to third countries, which lack pharmaceutical manufacturing capacities; and further, the first compulsory license grant in India in March 2012. The case analyses are based on the historical, factual and legal background. They reveal the main challenges of the 2003 WTO regime, including the lack of economic incentives for the generic pharmaceutical companies' participation. In the case of India's compulsory license grant, the article takes as in depth look into possible reasons for the reluctance to use the safeguard until recently, and the important aspects and implications of the Indian authorization to manufacture and sell a generic version of a patented cancer drug.
强制许可 是国际知识产权法为应对药品专利对获取重要药品产生的不良影响而提供的保障措施之一。本文研究了三个重要案例,以分析该机制的有效性和可行性:一是2003年在世贸组织立法框架下建立的新强制许可制度首次用于向缺乏制药能力的第三国出口药品;二是2012年3月印度首次授予强制许可。案例分析基于历史、事实和法律背景。这些分析揭示了2003年世贸组织制度面临的主要挑战,包括缺乏激励仿制药公司参与的经济诱因。在印度授予强制许可的案例中,本文深入探讨了直到最近才不愿使用这一保障措施的可能原因,以及印度授权生产和销售一种专利抗癌药物仿制药的重要方面和影响。