• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

耻骨后前列腺切除术与机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术治疗前列腺癌:术后并发症的比较研究

Retropubic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a comparative study of postoperative complications.

作者信息

Ryu Jeman, Kwon Taekmin, Kyung Yoon Soo, Hong Sungwoo, You Dalsan, Jeong In Gab, Kim Choung-Soo

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Urol. 2013 Nov;54(11):756-61. doi: 10.4111/kju.2013.54.11.756. Epub 2013 Nov 6.

DOI:10.4111/kju.2013.54.11.756
PMID:24255757
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3830968/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the complications of radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) with those of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) performed by a single surgeon for the treatment of prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The postoperative complications of 341 patients who underwent RRP and 524 patients who underwent RALP for prostate cancer at the Asan Medical Center between July 2007 and August 2012 were retrospectively reviewed and compared. Complications were classified according to the modified Clavien classification system.

RESULTS

RALP was associated with a shorter length of hospital stay (mean, 7.9 days vs. 10.1 days, p<0.001) and duration of urethral catheterization (6.2 days vs. 7.5 days, p<0.001) than RRP. Major complications (Clavien grade III-IV) were less common in the RALP group than in the RRP group (3.4% vs. 7.6%, p=0.006). There were no significant differences in medical complications between procedures. Considering surgical complications, urinary retention (7.0% vs. 2.7%, p=0.002) and wound repair (4.1% vs. 0.2%, p<0.001) were more common after RRP than after RALP. Extravasation of contrast medium during cystography was more common in the RRP group than in the RALP group (10.0% vs. 2.1%, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

RALP is associated with a lower complication rate than RRP.

摘要

目的

比较由同一位外科医生实施的耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术(RRP)与机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术(RALP)治疗前列腺癌的并发症。

材料与方法

回顾性分析并比较2007年7月至2012年8月在峨山医学中心接受RRP的341例患者和接受RALP的524例前列腺癌患者的术后并发症。并发症根据改良的Clavien分类系统进行分类。

结果

与RRP相比,RALP的住院时间更短(平均7.9天对10.1天,p<0.001),导尿管留置时间更短(6.2天对7.5天,p<0.001)。RALP组的主要并发症(Clavien III-IV级)比RRP组少见(3.4%对7.6%,p=0.006)。两种手术的医疗并发症无显著差异。考虑手术并发症,RRP术后尿潴留(7.0%对2.7%,p=0.002)和伤口修复(4.1%对0.2%,p<0.001)比RALP更常见。膀胱造影时造影剂外渗在RRP组比RALP组更常见(10.0%对2.1%,p<0.001)。

结论

RALP的并发症发生率低于RRP。

相似文献

1
Retropubic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a comparative study of postoperative complications.耻骨后前列腺切除术与机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术治疗前列腺癌:术后并发症的比较研究
Korean J Urol. 2013 Nov;54(11):756-61. doi: 10.4111/kju.2013.54.11.756. Epub 2013 Nov 6.
2
Radical prostatectomy after previous transurethral resection of the prostate: robot-assisted laparoscopic versus open radical prostatectomy in a matched-pair analysis.经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)后行根治性前列腺切除术:机器人辅助腹腔镜与开放性根治性前列腺切除术的配对分析。
J Endourol. 2012 Sep;26(9):1136-41. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0074. Epub 2012 May 31.
3
Benchmarks for operative outcomes of robotic and open radical prostatectomy: results from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与开放性根治性前列腺切除术的手术结果基准:健康专业人员随访研究的结果
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):432-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.01.039. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
4
Comparison of Acute Kidney Injury After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Versus Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术与耻骨后前列腺癌根治术后急性肾损伤的比较:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Feb;95(5):e2650. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002650.
5
Comparison of robotic-assisted versus retropubic radical prostatectomy performed by a single surgeon.单一外科医生进行的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术的比较。
Anticancer Res. 2009 May;29(5):1637-42.
6
Comparison of 90-day re-admission rates between open retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP), laparoscopic RP (LRP) and robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP).比较开放经耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术(RRP)、腹腔镜前列腺切除术(LRP)和机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术(RALP)术后 90 天再入院率。
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt C):E966-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11183.x. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
7
Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open: comparison of the learning curve of a single surgeon.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术与开放手术的比较:单刀医生的学习曲线比较。
J Endourol. 2012 Aug;26(8):1002-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0569. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
8
A retrospective comparison of anesthetic management of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术与耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术麻醉管理的回顾性比较
J Clin Anesth. 2009 Aug;21(5):322-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.09.005. Epub 2009 Aug 22.
9
A multi-institutional comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy, radical perineal prostatectomy, and robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for treatment of localized prostate cancer.耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术、会阴根治性前列腺切除术及机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌的多机构比较
J Robot Surg. 2009 Oct;3(3):175. doi: 10.1007/s11701-009-0158-2. Epub 2009 Oct 1.
10
Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus retropubic radical prostatectomy: a prospective assessment of postoperative pain.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术与耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术:术后疼痛的前瞻性评估
J Urol. 2005 Sep;174(3):912-4; discussion 914. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000169455.25510.ff.

引用本文的文献

1
Wound infection in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with retropubic radical prostate surgery: A meta-analysis.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术的伤口感染比较:一项荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2023 Nov;20(9):3550-3557. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14228. Epub 2023 Sep 7.
2
Long-term comparative outcome analysis of a robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy with retropubic radical prostatectomy by a single surgeon.由单一外科医生进行的机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术与耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术的长期比较结果分析。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Apr;17(2):677-685. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01479-6. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
3
Comparison Between Robotic and Laparoscopic or Open Anastomoses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.机器人手术与腹腔镜或开放吻合术的比较:系统评价与荟萃分析
Robot Surg. 2019 Dec 23;6:27-40. doi: 10.2147/RSRR.S186768. eCollection 2019.
4
Diagnosis of urine leakage after bladder repair: a prospective comparative study of ultra-low-dose CT cystography and conventional retrograde cystography.膀胱修复术后尿失禁的诊断:超低剂量 CT 膀胱造影与传统逆行性膀胱造影的前瞻性对比研究。
Radiol Med. 2019 Sep;124(9):812-818. doi: 10.1007/s11547-019-01041-9. Epub 2019 May 13.
5
Surgical site infections after radical prostatectomy: A comparative study between robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and retropubic radical prostatectomy.根治性前列腺切除术后手术部位感染:机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术与耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术的比较研究
Turk J Urol. 2018 Jul;44(4):303-310. doi: 10.5152/tud.2018.03435.
6
Comparison of retropubic, laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy: who is the winner?经耻骨后、腹腔镜和机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的比较:谁是赢家?
World J Urol. 2018 Apr;36(4):609-621. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2174-1. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
7
Robotic vs. Retropubic radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer: A systematic review and an meta-analysis update.机器人辅助与耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术治疗前列腺癌:系统评价与Meta分析更新
Oncotarget. 2017 May 9;8(19):32237-32257. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13332.
8
Urologic robotic surgery in Korea: past and present.韩国的泌尿外科机器人手术:过去与现在。
Korean J Urol. 2015 Aug;56(8):546-52. doi: 10.4111/kju.2015.56.8.546. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
9
Comparison of perioperative outcomes between running versus interrupted vesicourethral anastomosis in open radical prostatectomy: A single-surgeon experience.开放根治性前列腺切除术中连续与间断膀胱尿道吻合术围手术期结果的比较:单术者经验
Korean J Urol. 2015 Jun;56(6):443-8. doi: 10.4111/kju.2015.56.6.443. Epub 2015 Jun 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk and prevention of acute urinary retention after robotic prostatectomy.机器人前列腺切除术后急性尿潴留的风险与预防。
J Urol. 2013 Apr;189(4):1432-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.097. Epub 2012 Sep 25.
2
Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open: comparison of the learning curve of a single surgeon.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术与开放手术的比较:单刀医生的学习曲线比较。
J Endourol. 2012 Aug;26(8):1002-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0569. Epub 2012 Apr 30.
3
Cancer statistics, 2012.癌症统计数据,2012 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2012 Jan-Feb;62(1):10-29. doi: 10.3322/caac.20138. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
4
Robotic radical prostatectomy: a critical analysis of the impact on cancer control.机器人根治性前列腺切除术:对癌症控制影响的批判性分析。
Curr Opin Urol. 2011 May;21(3):179-84. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e328344e53e.
5
Can robot-assisted radical prostatectomy still be considered a new technology pushed by marketers? The IDEAL evaluation.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术还能被视为营销人员推动的一项新技术吗?IDEAL评估。
Eur Urol. 2010 Oct;58(4):525-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.07.033. Epub 2010 Aug 6.
6
Surgery-related complications in 1253 robot-assisted and 485 open retropubic radical prostatectomies at the Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden.瑞典卡罗林斯卡大学医院 1253 例机器人辅助和 485 例开放性经耻骨后前列腺根治性切除术的手术相关并发症。
Urology. 2010 May;75(5):1092-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.09.075.
7
Comprehensive standardized report of complications of retropubic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.经耻骨后和腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术并发症的综合标准化报告。
Eur Urol. 2010 Mar;57(3):371-86. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.11.034. Epub 2009 Nov 25.
8
A prospective, non-randomized trial comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy in one European institution.在一家欧洲机构进行的一项前瞻性、非随机试验,比较机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术和耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术。
BJU Int. 2009 Aug;104(4):534-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08419.x. Epub 2009 Mar 5.
9
Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies.耻骨后、腹腔镜及机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:比较研究的系统评价与累积分析
Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1037-63. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.01.036. Epub 2009 Jan 25.
10
Patterns of care for radical prostatectomy in the United States from 2003 to 2005.2003年至2005年美国根治性前列腺切除术的护理模式。
J Urol. 2008 Nov;180(5):1969-74. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.07.054. Epub 2008 Sep 17.