Suppr超能文献

目击证人辨认改革的实证与理论基础的演变

Evolution of the empirical and theoretical foundations of eyewitness identification reform.

作者信息

Clark Steven E, Moreland Molly B, Gronlund Scott D

机构信息

University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, USA,

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Apr;21(2):251-67. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0516-y.

Abstract

Scientists in many disciplines have begun to raise questions about the evolution of research findings over time (Ioannidis in Epidemiology, 19, 640-648, 2008; Jennions & Møller in Proceedings of the Royal Society, Biological Sciences, 269, 43-48, 2002; Mullen, Muellerleile, & Bryan in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1450-1462, 2001; Schooler in Nature, 470, 437, 2011), since many phenomena exhibit decline effects-reductions in the magnitudes of effect sizes as empirical evidence accumulates. The present article examines empirical and theoretical evolution in eyewitness identification research. For decades, the field has held that there are identification procedures that, if implemented by law enforcement, would increase eyewitness accuracy, either by reducing false identifications, with little or no change in correct identifications, or by increasing correct identifications, with little or no change in false identifications. Despite the durability of this no-cost view, it is unambiguously contradicted by data (Clark in Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 238-259, 2012a; Clark & Godfrey in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 22-42, 2009; Clark, Moreland, & Rush, 2013; Palmer & Brewer in Law and Human Behavior, 36, 247-255, 2012), raising questions as to how the no-cost view became well-accepted and endured for so long. Our analyses suggest that (1) seminal studies produced, or were interpreted as having produced, the no-cost pattern of results; (2) a compelling theory was developed that appeared to account for the no-cost pattern; (3) empirical results changed over the years, and subsequent studies did not reliably replicate the no-cost pattern; and (4) the no-cost view survived despite the accumulation of contradictory empirical evidence. Theories of memory that were ruled out by early data now appear to be supported by data, and the theory developed to account for early data now appears to be incorrect.

摘要

许多学科的科学家已经开始对研究结果随时间的演变提出疑问(约阿尼迪斯,《流行病学》,第19卷,第640 - 648页,2008年;詹尼恩斯和默勒,《皇家学会学报,生物科学》,第269卷,第43 - 48页,2002年;马伦、米勒莱勒和布莱恩,《个性与社会心理学通报》,第27卷,第1450 - 1462页,2001年;斯库勒,《自然》,第470卷,第437页,2011年),因为许多现象呈现出效应衰退——随着经验证据的积累,效应大小的量级会减小。本文考察了目击证人识别研究中的实证和理论演变。几十年来,该领域一直认为存在一些识别程序,如果由执法部门实施,将提高目击证人的准确性,要么通过减少错误识别,而正确识别几乎没有或没有变化,要么通过增加正确识别,而错误识别几乎没有或没有变化。尽管这种无成本观点持续存在,但数据明确与之矛盾(克拉克,《心理科学展望》,第7卷,第238 - 259页,2012a;克拉克和戈弗雷,《心理物理学通报与评论》,第16卷,第22 - 42页,2009年;克拉克、莫兰德和拉什,2013年;帕尔默和布鲁尔,《法律与人类行为》,第36卷,第247 - 255页,2012年),这就引发了关于这种无成本观点如何被广泛接受并持续如此之久的疑问。我们的分析表明:(1)开创性研究产生了,或者被解释为产生了无成本的结果模式;(2)形成了一个有说服力的理论,似乎可以解释无成本模式;(3)多年来实证结果发生了变化,随后的研究未能可靠地重现无成本模式;(4)尽管有相互矛盾的实证证据积累,无成本观点仍然存在。早期数据排除的记忆理论现在似乎得到了数据支持,而用来解释早期数据而形成的理论现在似乎是不正确的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验