Scott Graham G, O'Donnell Patrick J, Sereno Sara C
Division of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, University of the West of Scotland, Paisley, PA1 2BE, UK.
Cogn Process. 2014 May;15(2):209-15. doi: 10.1007/s10339-013-0589-6. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
We examined the categorical nature of emotion word recognition. Positive, negative, and neutral words were presented in lexical decision tasks. Word frequency was additionally manipulated. In Experiment 1, "positive" and "negative" categories of words were implicitly indicated by the blocked design employed. A significant emotion-frequency interaction was obtained, replicating past research. While positive words consistently elicited faster responses than neutral words, only low frequency negative words demonstrated a similar advantage. In Experiments 2a and 2b, explicit categories ("positive," "negative," and "household" items) were specified to participants. Positive words again elicited faster responses than did neutral words. Responses to negative words, however, were no different than those to neutral words, regardless of their frequency. The overall pattern of effects indicates that positive words are always facilitated, frequency plays a greater role in the recognition of negative words, and a "negative" category represents a somewhat disparate set of emotions. These results support the notion that emotion word processing may be moderated by distinct systems.
我们研究了情感词识别的类别性质。在词汇判断任务中呈现积极、消极和中性词。此外还对词频进行了操控。在实验1中,所采用的区组设计隐含地表明了词的“积极”和“消极”类别。获得了显著的情感-频率交互作用,重复了以往的研究。虽然积极词始终比中性词引发更快的反应,但只有低频消极词表现出类似的优势。在实验2a和2b中,向参与者明确指定了类别(“积极”、“消极”和“家居”物品)。积极词再次比中性词引发更快的反应。然而,对消极词的反应与对中性词的反应没有差异,无论其频率如何。效应的总体模式表明,积极词总是得到促进,频率在消极词的识别中起更大作用,并且“消极”类别代表了一组有些不同的情感。这些结果支持了情感词加工可能由不同系统调节的观点。