Department of Kinesiology and Physical Education, Valdosta State University , Valdosta, GA., USA.
J Sports Sci Med. 2006 Jun 1;5(2):282-8. eCollection 2006.
The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between unilateral squat strength and measures of static balance to compare balance performance between the dominant and non-dominant leg. Seventeen apparently healthy men (mean mass 90.5 ± 20.9 kg and age 21.7 ± 1.8 yrs) and 25 women (mean mass 62.2 ± 14.5 kg and age 21.9 ± 1.3 yrs) completed the study. Weight bearing unilateral strength was measured with a 1RM modified unilateral squat on the dominant and non-dominant leg. The students completed the stork stand and wobble board tests to determine static balance on the dominant and non-dominant leg. Maximum time maintained in the stork stand position, on the ball of the foot with the uninvolved foot against the involved knee with hands on the hips, was recorded. Balance was measured with a 15 second wobble board test. No significant correlations were found between the measurements of unilateral balance and strength (r values ranged between -0.05 to 0.2) for the men and women. Time off balance was not significantly different between the subjects' dominant (men 1.1 ± 0.4 s; women 0.3 ± 0.1 s) and non-dominant (men 0.9 ± 0.3 s; women 0.3 ± 0.1 s) leg for the wobble board. Similar results were found for the time balanced during the stork stand test on the dominant (men 26.4 ± 6.3 s; women 24.1 ± 5.6 s) and non-dominant (men 26.0 ± 5.7 s; women 21.3 ± 4.1 s) leg. The data indicate that static balance and strength is unrelated in young adult men and women and gains made in one variable after training may not be associated with a change in performance of the other variable. These results also suggest that differences in static balance performance between legs can not be determined by leg dominance. Similar research is needed to compare contralateral leg balance in populations who participate in work or sport activities requiring repetitive asymmetrical use. A better understanding of contralateral balance performance will help practitioners make evaluative decisions during the rehabilitation process. Key Points1RM unilateral squat strength is unrelated to measures of unilateral static balance in young adult men and womenStatic balance is similar between the dominant and non-dominant leg in young adult men and womenSide-to-side differences in balance warrant assessment and training to correct imbalances prior to participation in activities that present a high risk for injury.
这项研究的目的是确定单侧深蹲力量与静态平衡测量之间的关系,以比较优势腿和非优势腿的平衡表现。17 名明显健康的男性(平均体重 90.5 ± 20.9kg,年龄 21.7 ± 1.8 岁)和 25 名女性(平均体重 62.2 ± 14.5kg,年龄 21.9 ± 1.3 岁)完成了这项研究。用改良的单侧深蹲测试测量了单侧深蹲力量,测试了优势腿和非优势腿的最大负重能力。学生们完成了鹳式站立和平衡板测试,以确定优势腿和非优势腿的静态平衡。记录在不涉及脚的情况下,用脚的球部支撑,将未涉及的脚靠在涉及的膝盖上,双手放在臀部上的鹳式站立位置的最大保持时间。使用 15 秒的平衡板测试来测量平衡。男性和女性的单侧平衡和力量测量值之间没有发现显著相关性(r 值范围在-0.05 到 0.2 之间)。在平衡板上,受试者的优势腿(男性 1.1 ± 0.4s;女性 0.3 ± 0.1s)和非优势腿(男性 0.9 ± 0.3s;女性 0.3 ± 0.1s)之间的失衡时间没有显著差异。在鹳式站立测试中,对优势腿(男性 26.4 ± 6.3s;女性 24.1 ± 5.6s)和非优势腿(男性 26.0 ± 5.7s;女性 21.3 ± 4.1s)的平衡时间也有类似的结果。数据表明,年轻男性和女性的静态平衡和力量没有关联,训练后一个变量的提高可能与另一个变量的表现变化无关。这些结果还表明,双腿之间的静态平衡表现差异不能通过腿部优势来确定。需要进行类似的研究,以比较从事需要重复不对称使用的工作或运动活动的人群的对侧腿部平衡。更好地了解对侧平衡表现将有助于从业者在康复过程中做出评估决策。关键点:1RM 单侧深蹲力量与年轻男性和女性的单侧静态平衡测量值无关。在年轻男性和女性中,优势腿和非优势腿的静态平衡相似。在年轻男性和女性中,平衡的左右侧差异需要进行评估和训练,以在参加高风险受伤活动之前纠正平衡失衡。