Jayaratne Toby Epstein, Ybarra Oscar, Sheldon Jane P, Brown Tony N, Feldbaum Merle, Pfeffer Carla, Petty Elizabeth M
Institute for Research on Women and Gender, University of Michigan.
Group Process Intergroup Relat. 2006 Jan;9(1). doi: 10.1177/1368430206059863.
This study examined the relationship between White Americans' genetic explanations, conceptualized as genetic lay theories, for perceived racial differences and for sexual orientation, and attitudes toward Blacks, and gay men and lesbians, respectively. Considering contrasting public discourse surrounding race and sexual orientation, we predicted that genetic lay theories would be associated with greater prejudice toward Blacks, but less prejudice toward gay men and lesbians. The findings, based on a representative sample of 600 White Americans, were consistent with expectations. Results are discussed in relation to the literature on essentialism and implicit theories of the malleability of traits. The present research broadens our view of lay theories by showing how they support either prejudice or tolerance, depending on the target group.
本研究考察了美国白人对感知到的种族差异和性取向的基因解释(概念化为基因外行理论)与对黑人、男同性恋者和女同性恋者的态度之间的关系。考虑到围绕种族和性取向的不同公众话语,我们预测基因外行理论将与对黑人的更多偏见相关,但与对男同性恋者和女同性恋者的偏见较少相关。基于600名美国白人的代表性样本的研究结果与预期一致。研究结果结合关于本质主义和特质可塑性的隐性理论的文献进行了讨论。本研究通过展示外行理论如何根据目标群体支持偏见或宽容,拓宽了我们对外行理论的看法。