Ambarkova Vesna, Galić Ivan, Vodanović Marin, Biočina-Lukenda Dolores, Brkić Hrvoje
Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, The Saints Cyril and Methodius University of Skopje, Vodnjanska 17, 91000 Skopje, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.
University Department of Health Studies, University of Split, Ruđera Boškovića 31, 21000 Split, Croatia; Department of Dental Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Split, Ruđera Boškovića 31, 21000 Split, Croatia.
Forensic Sci Int. 2014 Jan;234:187.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.10.024. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
To evaluate applicability of Demirjian and Willems methods for calculating dental age of children in the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia we analyzed panoramic radiographs of 966 children (485 female and 481 male, aged 6-13 years) treated at the University and Community Dental Clinics in Skopje using four Demirjian methods and a Willems method for determining dental ages. Intra-rater and inter-rater agreement of mineralization stages were 0.86 and 0.82, respectively. All methods significantly overestimated dental age when compared to the chronological age (p<0.001). In males, the lowest overestimation was shown using Willems method (0.52±0.87 years), followed by Demirjian methods from 1976 using PM1, PM2, M1, M2 teeth (0.69±0.92 years) and using I2, PM1, PM2, M2 teeth (0.80±0.98 years). The greatest overestimation were shown using Demirjian methods using 7 teeth from 1976 (0.92±0.99 years) and method from 1973 (1.06±1.07 years). In females, the lowest overestimation was shown using Willems method (0.33±0.83 years) than the Demirjian method using PM1, PM2, M1, M2 teeth (1.00±1.01 years), following methods from 1976 using 7 teeth (1.03±1.01 years) and I2, PM1, PM2, M2 teeth (1.12±0.96 years). The greatest overestimation was for method from 1973 using 7 teeth (1.17±0.98 years). Willems method was the most accurate while Demirjian's methods for dental age calculation are not suitable on children from the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.
为评估德米尔坚(Demirjian)法和威廉姆斯(Willems)法在前南斯拉夫的马其顿共和国儿童牙龄计算中的适用性,我们分析了在斯科普里的大学和社区牙科诊所接受治疗的966名儿童(485名女性和481名男性,年龄6 - 13岁)的全景X线片,使用四种德米尔坚法和一种威廉姆斯法来确定牙龄。矿化阶段的评估者内和评估者间一致性分别为0.86和0.82。与实际年龄相比,所有方法均显著高估了牙龄(p<0.001)。在男性中,使用威廉姆斯法时高估程度最低(0.52±0.87岁),其次是1976年使用第一前磨牙(PM1)、第二前磨牙(PM2)、第一磨牙(M1)、第二磨牙(M2)牙齿的德米尔坚法(0.69±0.92岁)以及使用侧切牙(I2)、PM1、PM2、M2牙齿的德米尔坚法(0.80±0.98岁)。使用1976年的7颗牙齿的德米尔坚法(0.92±0.99岁)和1973年的方法(1.06±1.07岁)高估程度最大。在女性中,使用威廉姆斯法时高估程度最低(0.33±0.83岁),低于使用PM1、PM2、M1、M2牙齿的德米尔坚法(1.00±1.01岁),其次是1976年使用7颗牙齿的方法(1.03±1.01岁)和使用I2、PM1、PM2、M2牙齿的方法(1.12±0.96岁)。使用1973年的7颗牙齿的方法高估程度最大(1.17±0.98岁)。威廉姆斯法最准确,而德米尔坚的牙龄计算方法不适用于前南斯拉夫的马其顿共和国的儿童。