Johnston Fabian M, Tergas Ana I, Bennett Jennifer L, Valero Vicente, Morrissey Candice K, Fader Amanda N, Hobson Deborah B, Weaver Sallie J, Rosen Michael A, Wick Elizabeth C
The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
Am J Med Qual. 2014 Nov-Dec;29(6):491-8. doi: 10.1177/1062860613509402. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
Operating room briefings improve patient outcomes; however, implementation and methods to measure are lacking. A briefing audit tool was developed with 4 domains: briefing logistics, briefing basics, specific briefing content, and briefing participation. The tool evaluated preoperative briefings across surgical services at an academic medical center. Sixty-three preoperative briefings were observed. Introduction by name and role occurred in 15% of cases. There was a wide variation in discussion of the critical goals of the surgical procedure among services D (100%), A (26%), B (19%), and C (0%). Participation in the briefing was variable among stakeholders and between services. Verbal contributions were variable across all roles ranging from 65% (surgeons) to 11% (trainees and surgical technologist). Preoperative briefing compliance is variable. Deficiencies varied between service lines, possibly highlighting the need for service-specific customization of the briefing tool in surgery. This tool is a practical method for the study of briefing implementation.
手术室术前简报可改善患者预后;然而,目前缺乏相关实施方法及衡量手段。为此开发了一种包含四个领域的简报审计工具:简报后勤、简报基础、特定简报内容和简报参与情况。该工具对一家学术医疗中心各外科手术科室的术前简报进行了评估。共观察了63次术前简报。仅有15%的简报介绍了参与者的姓名和角色。各科室在讨论手术关键目标方面差异很大,其中科室D为100%,科室A为26%,科室B为19%,科室C为0%。利益相关者之间以及各科室之间参与简报的情况各不相同。所有角色的口头参与度也有所不同,范围从65%(外科医生)到11%(实习生和手术技师)。术前简报的合规情况参差不齐。各业务线之间的不足之处存在差异,这可能凸显了针对手术科室特定需求定制简报工具的必要性。该工具是研究简报实施情况的一种实用方法。