Ross Cody T, Weise Jessica A, Bonnar Sarah, Nolin David, Satkoski Trask Jessica, Smith David Glenn, Ferguson Betsy, Ha James, Kubisch H Michael, Vinson Amanda, Kanthaswamy Sree
Molecular Anthropology Laboratory, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Davis, California; California National Primate Research Center, University of California, Davis, California.
Am J Primatol. 2014 Apr;76(4):313-24. doi: 10.1002/ajp.22235. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
We compare the effectiveness of short tandem repeat (STR) and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotypes for estimating pairwise relatedness, using molecular data and pedigree records from a captive Chinese rhesus macaque population at the California National Primate Research Center. We find that a panel of 81 SNPs is as effective at estimating first-order kin relationships as a panel of 14 highly polymorphic STRs. We note, however, that the selected STRs provide more precise predictions of relatedness than the selected SNPs, and may be preferred in contexts that require the discrimination of kin related more distantly than first-order relatives. Additionally, we compare the performance of three commonly used relatedness estimation algorithms, and find that the Wang [2002] algorithm outperforms other algorithms when analyzing STR data, while the Queller & Goodnight [1989] algorithm outperforms other algorithms when analyzing SNP data. Future research is needed to address the number of SNPs required to reach the discriminatory power of a standard STR panel in relatedness estimation for primate colony management.
我们利用加利福尼亚国家灵长类研究中心圈养的中国恒河猴种群的分子数据和谱系记录,比较了短串联重复序列(STR)和单核苷酸多态性(SNP)基因型在估计成对亲缘关系方面的有效性。我们发现,一组81个SNP在估计一级亲属关系方面与一组14个高度多态性的STR一样有效。然而,我们注意到,所选的STR比所选的SNP能提供更精确的亲缘关系预测,并且在需要区分比一级亲属关系更远的亲属关系的情况下可能更受青睐。此外,我们比较了三种常用的亲缘关系估计算法的性能,发现在分析STR数据时,Wang[2002]算法优于其他算法,而在分析SNP数据时,Queller&Goodnight[1989]算法优于其他算法。未来的研究需要解决在灵长类动物群体管理的亲缘关系估计中,达到标准STR面板的鉴别力所需的SNP数量。