Regional Center for Neurosensory Disorders, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Department of Dental Ecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
J Pain. 2013 Dec;14(12 Suppl):T116-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.09.010.
Papers in this issue investigate when and how putative risk factors influence development of first-onset, painful temporomandibular disorder (TMD). The results represent first findings from the Orofacial Pain: Prospective Evaluation and Risk Assessment (OPPERA) prospective cohort study that monitored 2,737 men and women aged 18 to 44 years recruited at 4 U.S. study sites. During a median 2.8-year follow-up period, 260 participants developed TMD. The average incidence rate of 4% per annum was influenced by a broad range of phenotypic risk factors including sociodemographic characteristics, health status, clinical orofacial factors, psychological functioning, pain sensitivity, and cardiac autonomic responses. A novel method of multivariable analysis used random forest models to simultaneously evaluate contributions of all 202 phenotypic variables. Variables from the health status domain made the greatest contribution to TMD incidence, followed closely by psychological and clinical orofacial domains. However, only a few measures of pain sensitivity and autonomic function contributed to TMD incidence, and their effects were modest. Meanwhile, age and study site were independent predictors of TMD incidence, even after controlling for other phenotypes. Separate analysis of 358 genes that regulate pain found several novel genetic associations with intermediate phenotypes that, themselves, are risk factors for TMD, suggesting new avenues to investigate biological pathways contributing to TMD.
Collectively, the papers in this issue demonstrate that TMD is a complex disorder with multiple causes consistent with a biopsychosocial model of illness. It is a misnomer and no longer appropriate to regard TMD solely as a localized orofacial pain condition.
本期刊登的论文探讨了假定的危险因素何时以及如何影响首发、疼痛性颞下颌关节紊乱(TMD)的发展。这些结果代表了正在进行的口腔颌面部疼痛:前瞻性评估和风险评估(OPPERA)前瞻性队列研究的初步发现,该研究监测了来自美国 4 个研究地点的 2737 名年龄在 18 至 44 岁的男性和女性。在中位数为 2.8 年的随访期间,有 260 名参与者出现了 TMD。每年 4%的平均发病率受到广泛的表型危险因素的影响,包括社会人口统计学特征、健康状况、临床口腔因素、心理功能、疼痛敏感性和心脏自主神经反应。一种新的多变量分析方法使用随机森林模型同时评估了 202 个表型变量的贡献。健康状况领域的变量对 TMD 发病率的贡献最大,其次是心理和临床口腔领域。然而,只有少数疼痛敏感性和自主功能测量对 TMD 发病率有贡献,而且其影响较小。同时,年龄和研究地点是 TMD 发病率的独立预测因素,即使在控制了其他表型后也是如此。对调节疼痛的 358 个基因的单独分析发现了几个与中间表型的新遗传关联,这些表型本身就是 TMD 的危险因素,这表明了新的途径来研究导致 TMD 的生物学途径。
本期刊登的论文总体上表明 TMD 是一种复杂的疾病,有多种病因,符合疾病的生物心理社会模型。将 TMD 仅仅视为一种局部性的口腔颌面部疼痛疾病是一种误解,不再合适。