Ibitoye Mobolaji, Frasca Timothy, Giguere Rebecca, Carballo-Diéguez Alex
HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies at New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit 15, New York, NY, 10032, USA,
AIDS Behav. 2014 May;18(5):933-49. doi: 10.1007/s10461-013-0668-9.
The recent approval in the United States of the first rapid home test to diagnose HIV raises questions about its potential use and impact. We reviewed the existing literature on the unassisted use of home tests involving self-collection and testing of biological samples by untrained users-including existing HIV self-testing studies-to shed some light on what can be expected from the availability of the HIV home test. The studies reviewed showed that most participants could properly perform home tests, obtain accurate results, and interpret them-yielding high correlations with laboratory and health-professional performed tests. Users often had trouble performing blood-based tests. Participants generally understood the need to confirm positive test results. Materials accompanying HIV home tests should emphasize symptoms of acute infection and the need for additional testing when recent infection is suspected. Different home-test-based screening modalities, personalized HIV-counseling resources and HIV home test impact evaluation methods should be studied.
美国近期批准了首个用于诊断艾滋病病毒(HIV)的快速家庭检测试剂,这引发了关于其潜在用途和影响的诸多问题。我们回顾了现有关于非专业人员自行采集和检测生物样本的家庭检测的文献,包括现有的HIV自我检测研究,以了解HIV家庭检测的可得性可能带来的结果。所回顾的研究表明,大多数参与者能够正确进行家庭检测、获得准确结果并进行解读,与实验室检测及医疗专业人员进行的检测结果高度相关。用户在进行血液检测时常常遇到困难。参与者普遍理解需要对检测呈阳性的结果进行确认。HIV家庭检测试剂所附带的材料应强调急性感染的症状以及在怀疑近期感染时需要进行额外检测。应研究不同的基于家庭检测的筛查方式、个性化的HIV咨询资源以及HIV家庭检测影响评估方法。