Suppr超能文献

980纳米和1470纳米静脉内激光消融、静脉内射频消融及静脉内蒸汽消融的温度曲线

Temperature profiles of 980- and 1,470-nm endovenous laser ablation, endovenous radiofrequency ablation and endovenous steam ablation.

作者信息

Malskat W S J, Stokbroekx M A L, van der Geld C W M, Nijsten T E C, van den Bos R R

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Burgemeester's Jacobsplein 51, 3015, CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands,

出版信息

Lasers Med Sci. 2014 Mar;29(2):423-9. doi: 10.1007/s10103-013-1449-4. Epub 2013 Nov 30.

Abstract

Endovenous thermal ablation (EVTA) techniques are very effective for the treatment of varicose veins, but their exact working mechanism is still not well documented. The lack of knowledge of mechanistic properties has led to a variety of EVTA protocols and a commercially driven dissemination of new or modified techniques without robust scientific evidence. The aim of this study is to compare temperature profiles of 980-and 1,470-nm endovenous laser ablation (EVLA), segmental radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and endovenous steam ablation (EVSA). In an experimental setting, temperature measurements were performed using thermocouples; raw potato was used to mimic a vein wall. Two laser wavelengths (980 and 1,470 nm) were used with tulip-tip fibers and 1,470 nm also with a radial-emitting fiber. Different powers and pullback speeds were used to achieve fluences of 30, 60, and 90 J/cm. For segmental RFA, 1 cycle of 20 s was analyzed. EVSA was performed with two and three pulses of steam per centimeter. Maximum temperature increase, time span of relevant temperature increase, and area under the curve of the time of relevant temperature increase were measured. In all EVLA settings, temperatures increased and decreased rapidly. High fluence is associated with significantly higher temperatures and increased time span of temperature rise. Temperature profiles of 980- and 1,470-nm EVLA with tulip-tip fibers did not differ significantly. Radial EVLA showed significantly higher maximum temperatures than tulip-tip EVLA. EVSA resulted in mild peak temperatures for longer durations than EVLA. Maximum temperatures with three pulses per centimeter were significantly higher than with two pulses. RFA temperature rises were relatively mild, resulting in a plateau-shaped temperature profile, similar to EVSA. Temperature increase during EVLA is fast with a high-peak temperature for a short time, where EVSA and RFA have longer plateau phases and lower maximum temperatures.

摘要

静脉内热消融(EVTA)技术在治疗静脉曲张方面非常有效,但其确切的工作机制仍未得到充分记录。对其机械性能缺乏了解导致了多种EVTA方案以及在缺乏有力科学证据的情况下,新的或改良技术受商业驱动的传播。本研究的目的是比较980纳米和1470纳米静脉内激光消融(EVLA)、分段射频消融(RFA)和静脉内蒸汽消融(EVSA)的温度分布。在实验环境中,使用热电偶进行温度测量;用生土豆模拟静脉壁。两种激光波长(980纳米和1470纳米)与郁金香头光纤一起使用,1470纳米也与径向发射光纤一起使用。使用不同的功率和回撤速度以达到30、60和90焦每平方厘米的能量密度。对于分段RFA,分析了1个20秒的周期。EVSA每厘米进行2次和3次蒸汽脉冲。测量了最大温度升高、相关温度升高的时间跨度以及相关温度升高时间曲线下的面积。在所有EVLA设置中,温度快速上升和下降。高能量密度与显著更高的温度和温度上升时间的增加相关。980纳米和1470纳米郁金香头光纤EVLA的温度分布没有显著差异。径向EVLA的最高温度显著高于郁金香头EVLA。EVSA在较长时间内产生的峰值温度比EVLA温和。每厘米3次脉冲的最高温度显著高于2次脉冲。RFA温度上升相对温和,导致温度分布呈平台状,类似于EVSA。EVLA期间温度上升迅速,短时间内达到高温峰值,而EVSA和RFA具有更长的平台期和更低的最高温度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验