Benarroch-Gampel Jaime, Riall Taylor S
Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Boulevard, Galveston, TX 77555, USA.
Adv Surg. 2013;47:81-98. doi: 10.1016/j.yasu.2013.02.005.
Current recommendations from the 2002 ASA Task Force on Preanesthesia Evaluation are not specific to ambulatory surgery and are not based on strongly designed and adequately powered studies. Furthermore, although the ASA does not advocate routine testing or testing without indication, the guidelines for "selective" or "indicated" testing are unclear. As a result, preoperative testing in the United States is overused relative to the current ASA Task Force recommendations. Uncertainty regarding indications leads to wide variation in the use of preoperative testing across providers. There is evidence to suggest that current guidelines may recommend testing more than is necessary. Several studies reviewed in this article have shown that the elimination of routine testing and more selective use based on patient history and physical examination findings would decrease cost and increase patient satisfaction without detriment to patient care. Future studies should evaluate the effectiveness of testing in specific clinical situations, allowing for identification of clear conditions under which preoperative testing should be performed. This approach would allow the promulgation of clear guidelines, the development of which should involve surgeons (as members of a multidisciplinary team), anesthesiologists, and hospital administrators, together with governing bodies such as the ASA and American College of Surgeons that offer support for the dissemination and broad adoption of guidelines. In the future, studies should focus not only on identifying specific clinical situations whereby preoperative testing will be beneficial but also on determining current barriers to improving adherence to guidelines. Potential barriers include institutional policies for testing, physician reluctance to change practice, problems in communication between members involved in perioperative care, and legal consequences of not ordering preoperative tests. Identification of reasons for overuse of testing is the first step toward changing practice. Once clear guidelines are developed, the creation of preoperative clinics that centralize preoperative care, or promoting the use of clinical pathways and/or checklists for determining appropriate tests, may improve the adequate use of preoperative tests. It will be critical for quality improvement measures to include surgeons, anesthesiologists, hospital administrators, and governing bodies such as the ASA and American College of Surgeons to achieve success.
2002年美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)麻醉前评估特别工作组的现行建议并非专门针对门诊手术,也并非基于设计严谨、样本量充足的研究。此外,尽管ASA不提倡常规检查或无指征检查,但“选择性”或“有指征”检查的指南并不明确。因此,相对于ASA特别工作组的现行建议,美国术前检查存在过度使用的情况。指征的不确定性导致不同医疗服务提供者在术前检查的使用上差异很大。有证据表明,现行指南可能建议了不必要的过多检查。本文综述的几项研究表明,取消常规检查并根据患者病史和体格检查结果进行更有选择性的检查,将降低成本并提高患者满意度,且不会损害患者护理。未来的研究应评估特定临床情况下检查的有效性,以便确定应进行术前检查的明确条件。这种方法将有助于颁布明确的指南,指南的制定应包括外科医生(作为多学科团队成员)、麻醉医生、医院管理人员,以及诸如ASA和美国外科医师学会等管理机构,这些机构为指南的传播和广泛采用提供支持。未来,研究不仅应关注确定术前检查有益的特定临床情况,还应关注确定当前改善指南依从性的障碍。潜在障碍包括检查的机构政策、医生不愿改变做法、围手术期护理相关人员之间的沟通问题以及未安排术前检查的法律后果。确定检查过度使用的原因是改变做法的第一步。一旦制定了明确的指南,设立集中术前护理的术前诊所,或推广使用临床路径和/或清单来确定适当的检查,可能会改善术前检查的合理使用。质量改进措施要取得成功,外科医生、麻醉医生、医院管理人员以及诸如ASA和美国外科医师学会等管理机构的参与至关重要。