School of Dentistry, College of Medicine, China Medical University, 91 Hsueh-Shih Road, Taichung 40402, Taiwan.
Comput Math Methods Med. 2013;2013:608570. doi: 10.1155/2013/608570. Epub 2013 Nov 3.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the location of the mandibular canal and the thickness of the occlusal cortical bone at dental implant sites in the lower second premolar and lower first molar by using dental cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Seventy-nine sites (47 second premolar and 32 first molar sites) were identified in the dental CBCT examinations of 47 patients. In this study, 4 parameters were measured: (1) MC-the distance from the mandibular canal to the upper border of the mandible; (2) CD-the distance from the mandibular canal to the buccal border of the mandible; (3) MD-the distance from the mandibular canal to the lingual border of the mandible; (4) TC-the thickness of the cortical bone at the occlusal side. A statistical analysis was employed to compare the size and differences between these 4 parameters at the lower second premolar and lower first molar. Regarding the MC and MD, the experimental results showed no statistical difference between the first molar and second premolar. However, the TC for the second premolar was greater than that of the first molar. Thus, careful consideration is necessary in choosing the size of and operation type for dental implants.
本研究旨在通过口腔锥形束 CT(CBCT)评估下颌第二前磨牙和下颌第一磨牙种植位点下颌管的位置和咬合皮质骨的厚度。在 47 名患者的口腔 CBCT 检查中确定了 79 个部位(47 个第二前磨牙部位和 32 个第一磨牙部位)。在本研究中,测量了 4 个参数:(1)MC-从下颌管到下颌骨上缘的距离;(2)CD-从下颌管到下颌骨颊缘的距离;(3)MD-从下颌管到下颌骨舌缘的距离;(4)TC-咬合侧皮质骨的厚度。采用统计学分析比较了下颌第二前磨牙和下颌第一磨牙这 4 个参数的大小和差异。关于 MC 和 MD,实验结果表明第一磨牙和第二前磨牙之间没有统计学差异。然而,第二前磨牙的 TC 大于第一磨牙。因此,在选择种植体的尺寸和手术类型时需要慎重考虑。