Suppr超能文献

采用肉毒毒素 A 联合透明质酸与单独注射肉毒毒素 A 治疗额/眉间皱纹复合体:一项半面、盲法、随机对照试验。

Treatment of forehead/glabellar rhytide complex with combination botulinum toxin a and hyaluronic acid versus botulinum toxin A injection alone: a split-face, rater-blinded, randomized control trial.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

J Cosmet Dermatol. 2013 Dec;12(4):261-6. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12059.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Forehead and glabella rhytides are treated mostly with neurotoxins, although some practitioners prefer the concurrent use of fillers. It has been suggested that combination treatments can result in a better overall improvement.

AIMS

To compare the safety and effectiveness of treatment of forehead and glabellar lines with botulinum toxin A alone versus botulinum toxin A and filler.

METHODS

Split-face, randomized control trial. Twenty subjects with forehead/glabellar rhytide complex (static and dynamic creases) enrolled. Subjects were randomized and injected with botulinum toxin alone on one side of the forehead/glabella and hyaluronic acid filler followed by botulinum toxin on the other side. Blinded ratings were obtained to assess the effectiveness of treatment for static and dynamic rhytides, respectively, at 2-week, 6-week, 3-month, and 6-month follow-up visits. Subjects performed a self-evaluation at the end of the study. Adverse events were recorded.

RESULTS

Ratings of both treatments showed comparable efficacy, with 100% of subjects experiencing improvement from baseline regardless of treatment type at weeks 2, 6, and 12. Combination treatment produced longer-lasting results in dynamic forehead wrinkles, and greater static and dynamic wrinkle reduction in the glabella at week 24. Subject self-evaluations showed that both treatments were effective, with a nominal preference for combination treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Glabella and forehead lines can be effectively and safely reduced with neurotoxin alone as well as neurotoxin in combination with fillers. Combination treatment may provide a slightly better cumulative benefit and also increase the persistence of effect.

摘要

背景

额部和眉间皱纹主要采用神经毒素治疗,尽管一些医生更喜欢同时使用填充物。有人认为联合治疗可以获得更好的整体改善效果。

目的

比较单独使用肉毒毒素 A 与肉毒毒素 A 和填充物联合治疗额部和眉间线的安全性和有效性。

方法

采用半脸、随机对照试验。共招募了 20 名额部/眉间皱纹综合征(静态和动态皱纹)患者。患者随机分为两组,一组额部/眉间的一侧注射肉毒毒素单独治疗,另一侧注射透明质酸填充物,然后再注射肉毒毒素。在 2 周、6 周、3 个月和 6 个月的随访时,分别对静态和动态皱纹的治疗效果进行盲法评估。研究结束时,患者进行自我评估。记录不良反应。

结果

两种治疗方法的评分均显示出相当的疗效,无论治疗类型如何,100%的患者在第 2、6 和 12 周均有改善。联合治疗在第 24 周时产生了更持久的动态额部皱纹效果,在第 24 周时对眉间的静态和动态皱纹也有更大的改善。患者的自我评估表明,两种治疗方法均有效,对联合治疗的效果略有偏好。

结论

单独使用神经毒素或联合使用神经毒素和填充物均可有效、安全地减少额部和眉间线。联合治疗可能会提供稍微更好的累积效益,并增加效果的持久性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验