Silvola Anna-Sofia, Varimo Maiju, Tolvanen Mimmi, Rusanen Jaana, Lahti Satu, Pirttiniemi Pertti
a Postgraduate student, Department of Oral Development and Orthodontics, Institute of Dentistry, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Angle Orthod. 2014 Jul;84(4):594-9. doi: 10.2319/060213-417.1. Epub 2013 Dec 5.
To investigate the association between satisfaction with dental esthetics and quality of life, and esthetics satisfaction in relation to esthetic evaluations of three panel groups.
Fifty-two patients (36 women, 16 men; age 18-61 years) with severe malocclusion were treated in Oulu University Hospital. Of these, 38 and 14 patients underwent orthodontic/surgical treatment and orthodontic treatment, respectively. A questionnaire and dental photographs were collected before and after treatment. The 14-item Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) was used to measure oral health-related quality of life. Satisfaction with dental esthetics was evaluated using the Visual Analogue Scale. Dental photographs were presented to three panel groups: 30 laypersons, 30 dental students, and 10 orthodontists, who rated the photographs using the Aesthetic Component of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need.
Oral health-related quality of life (OHIP-14 severity score) and esthetic satisfaction (according to the Visual Analogue Scale) improved after the treatment (P < .001). The most unsatisfied patients reported oral effects more often both before and after treatment. Changes in oral health-related quality of life components of severity, psychological discomfort, and psychological disability correlated positively with the changes in esthetic satisfaction. Orthodontists graded the situation before treatment as worse and the outcome as better than the laypersons; the level of grading by dental students fell between these two groups.
Improvement in esthetic satisfaction due to the treatment of severe malocclusion improves oral health-related quality of life, particularly by decreasing psychological discomfort and psychological disability.
研究牙齿美学满意度与生活质量之间的关联,以及美学满意度与三个评判小组美学评价的关系。
奥卢大学医院对52例严重错牙合畸形患者(36名女性,16名男性;年龄18 - 61岁)进行了治疗。其中,38例和14例患者分别接受了正畸/外科治疗和正畸治疗。在治疗前后收集了问卷和牙科照片。采用14项口腔健康影响程度量表(OHIP - 14)来测量与口腔健康相关的生活质量。使用视觉模拟量表评估牙齿美学满意度。将牙科照片展示给三个评判小组:30名外行人、30名牙科学生和10名正畸医生,他们使用正畸治疗需要指数的美学成分对照片进行评分。
治疗后,与口腔健康相关的生活质量(OHIP - 14严重程度评分)和美学满意度(根据视觉模拟量表)有所改善(P <.001)。最不满意的患者在治疗前后报告口腔影响的情况更频繁。与口腔健康相关的生活质量在严重程度、心理不适和心理残疾方面的变化与美学满意度的变化呈正相关。正畸医生对治疗前情况的评分比外行人低,对治疗结果的评分比外行人高;牙科学生的评分水平介于这两组之间。
严重错牙合畸形治疗后美学满意度的提高改善了与口腔健康相关的生活质量,特别是通过减少心理不适和心理残疾。