Suppr超能文献

致学术健康中心申办方研究者的警告信——监管领域的“煤矿中的金丝雀”

Warning letters to sponsor-investigators at academic health centres - the regulatory "canaries in a coal mine".

作者信息

O'Reilly Erin K, Blair Holbein M E, Berglund Jelena P, Parrish Amanda B, Roth Mary-Tara, Burnett Bruce K

机构信息

.

出版信息

Clin Invest Med. 2013 Dec 1;36(6):E290-6. doi: 10.25011/cim.v36i6.20626.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study highlights Warning Letter (WL) findings issued to sponsor-investigators (S-Is) by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

METHODS

The online index of WLs issued from October 1, 2007 through September 30, 2012 was reviewed [1]. Through a manual screening process, letters were evaluated if specifically issued to 'clinical investigators', 'sponsors' or 'sponsor-investigators'. A particular focus was given to S-Is at Academic Health Centres (AHCs). Each letter was scored for the presence of violations in 40 general regulatory categories.

RESULTS

A review of FDA WLs issued over a five-year period (FDA Fiscal Years 2008-2012) revealed that WLs to S-Is represent half of the WLs issued to all sponsors (16 of 32 letters). A review of these letters indicates that S-Is are not aware of, or simply do not meet, their regulatory responsibilities as either investigators or sponsors. In comparing total sponsor letters to those of S-Is, the most cited violation was the same: a lack of monitoring. A review of publicly available inspection data indicates that these 16 letters merely represent the tip of the iceberg.

CONCLUSION

This review of the WL database reveals the potential for serious regulatory violations among S-Is at AHCs. Recent translational funding initiatives may serve to increase the number of S-Is, especially among Academic Health Centres (AHCs) [2]; thus, AHCs must become aware of this S-I role and work to support investigators who assume both roles in the course of their research.

摘要

目的

本研究着重介绍了美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)向申办者-研究者(S-Is)发出的警告信(WL)调查结果。

方法

对2007年10月1日至2012年9月30日期间发布的警告信在线索引进行了审查[1]。通过人工筛选过程,对专门发给“临床研究者”“申办者”或“申办者-研究者”的信件进行评估。特别关注学术健康中心(AHCs)的申办者-研究者。每封信根据40个一般监管类别中的违规情况进行评分。

结果

对FDA在五年期间(2008 - 2012财年)发出的警告信进行审查发现,发给申办者-研究者的警告信占发给所有申办者的警告信的一半(32封信中的16封)。对这些信件的审查表明,申办者-研究者要么没有意识到,要么根本没有履行其作为研究者或申办者的监管职责。在比较发给所有申办者的信件与发给申办者-研究者的信件时,最常被引用的违规行为是相同的:缺乏监测。对公开可用的检查数据进行审查表明,这16封信仅仅是冰山一角。

结论

对警告信数据库的审查揭示了学术健康中心申办者-研究者存在严重监管违规的可能性。最近的转化资金倡议可能会增加申办者-研究者的数量,尤其是在学术健康中心(AHCs)[2];因此,学术健康中心必须意识到这种申办者-研究者的角色,并努力支持在研究过程中承担这两种角色的研究者。

相似文献

7
Research Misconduct in FDA-Regulated Clinical Trials: A Cross-sectional Analysis of Warning Letters and Disqualification Proceedings.
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2018 Sep;52(5):592-605. doi: 10.1177/2168479017749514. Epub 2018 Jan 31.

本文引用的文献

2
Challenges and opportunities of drug repositioning.
Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2013 May;34(5):267-72. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2013.03.004. Epub 2013 Apr 12.
3
The CTSA Pharmaceutical Assets Portal - a public-private partnership model for drug repositioning.
Drug Discov Today Ther Strateg. 2011 Winter;8(3-4):77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ddstr.2011.06.006.
4
Drug Repurposing from an Academic Perspective.
Drug Discov Today Ther Strateg. 2011 Winter;8(3-4):61-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ddstr.2011.10.002.
6
Mining for therapeutic gold.
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2011 Jun;10(6):397. doi: 10.1038/nrd3461.
8
Study examines FDA warning letters about medical devices from 2009.
Biomed Instrum Technol. 2010 Jul-Aug;44(4):336-8. doi: 10.2345/0899-8205-44.4.336.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验