Suppr超能文献

迈向更深入了解欧洲非法烟草贸易:对菲莫国际资助的“星计划”报告的回顾。

Towards a greater understanding of the illicit tobacco trade in Europe: a review of the PMI funded 'Project Star' report.

机构信息

Department for Health and UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies (UKCTAS), University of Bath, Claverton Down Road, Bath, UK.

Department of Epidemiology, IRCCS-Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Tob Control. 2014 May;23(e1):e51-61. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051240. Epub 2013 Dec 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Following a legal agreement with the European Union (EU), Philip Morris International (PMI) commissions a yearly report ('Project Star', PS) on the European illicit cigarette trade from KPMG, the global accountancy firm.

METHODS

Review of PS 2010 report. Comparison with data from independent sources including a 2010 pan-European survey (N=18,056).

FINDINGS

Within PS, data covering all 27 EU countries are entered into a model. While the model itself seems appropriate, concerns are identified with the methodologies underlying the data inputs and thus their quality: there is little transparency over methodologies; interview data underestimate legal non-domestic product partly by failing to account for legal cross-border sales; illicit cigarette estimates rely on tobacco industry empty pack surveys which may overestimate illicit; and there is an over-reliance on data supplied by PMI with inadequate external validation. Thus, PMI sales data are validated using PMI smoking prevalence estimates, yet PMI is unable to provide sales (shipment) data for the Greek islands and its prevalence estimates differ grossly from independent data. Consequently, comparisons with independent data suggest PS will tend to overestimate illicit cigarette levels particularly where cross-border shopping is frequent (Austria, Finland, France) and in Western compared with Eastern European countries. The model also provides data on the nature of the illicit cigarette market independent of seizure data suggesting that almost a quarter of the illicit cigarette market in 2010 comprised PMI's own brands compared with just 5% counterfeited PMI brands; a finding hidden in PMI's public representation of the data.

CONCLUSIONS

PS overestimates illicit cigarette levels in some European countries and suggests PMI's supply chain control is inadequate. Its publication serves the interests of PMI over those of the EU and its member states. PS requires greater transparency, external scrutiny and use of independent data.

摘要

背景

在与欧盟(EU)达成法律协议后,菲利普莫里斯国际公司(PMI)委托毕马威(KPMG)这家全球会计事务所每年编写一份关于欧洲非法卷烟贸易的报告(“项目之星”,PS)。

方法

审查 PS 2010 年报告。与独立来源的数据进行比较,包括 2010 年泛欧调查(N=18056)。

结果

在 PS 中,涵盖所有 27 个欧盟国家的数据被输入到一个模型中。虽然模型本身似乎合适,但对数据输入背后的方法及其质量存在担忧:方法缺乏透明度;访谈数据低估了合法非国内产品的部分原因是未能考虑合法跨境销售;非法卷烟估计依赖于烟草业空烟盒调查,这可能会高估非法卷烟;并且过于依赖 PMI 提供的数据,而没有进行充分的外部验证。因此,使用 PMI 的吸烟流行率估计来验证 PMI 的销售数据,但 PMI 无法提供希腊岛屿的销售(出货)数据,其流行率估计与独立数据存在巨大差异。因此,与独立数据的比较表明,PS 往往会高估非法卷烟水平,特别是在跨境购物频繁的国家(奥地利、芬兰、法国)以及与东欧国家相比的西欧国家。该模型还提供了与缉获数据无关的非法卷烟市场性质的数据,表明 2010 年非法卷烟市场的近四分之一由 PMI 自有品牌组成,而假冒 PMI 品牌仅占 5%;这一发现隐藏在 PMI 对数据的公开表示中。

结论

PS 高估了一些欧洲国家的非法卷烟水平,并表明 PMI 的供应链控制不足。它的出版服务于 PMI 的利益,而不是欧盟及其成员国的利益。PS 需要更大的透明度、外部审查和使用独立数据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e6e/4078702/8de0870e451b/tobaccocontrol-2013-051240f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验