Masuda H, Brewer T M, Liu D D, Iwamoto T, Shen Y, Hsu L, Willey J S, Gonzalez-Angulo A M, Chavez-MacGregor M, Fouad T M, Woodward W A, Reuben J M, Valero V, Alvarez R H, Hortobagyi G N, Ueno N T
Department of Breast Medical Oncology.
Ann Oncol. 2014 Feb;25(2):384-91. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt525. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
Subtypes defined by hormonal receptor (HR) and HER2 status have not been well studied in inflammatory breast cancer (IBC). We characterized clinical parameters and long-term outcomes, and compared pathological complete response (pCR) rates by HR/HER2 subtype in a large IBC patient population. We also compared disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) between IBC patients who received targeted therapies (anti-hormonal, anti-HER2) and those who did not.
We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients diagnosed with IBC and treated at MD Anderson Cancer Center from January 1989 to January 2011. Of those, 527 patients had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and had available information on estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 status. HR status was considered positive if either ER or PR status was positive. Using the Kaplan-Meier method, we estimated median DFS and OS durations from the time of definitive surgery. Using the Cox proportional hazards regression model, we determined the effect of prognostic factors on DFS and OS. Results were compared by subtype.
The overall pCR rate in stage III IBC was 15.2%, with the HR-positive/HER2-negative subtype showing the lowest rate (7.5%) and the HR-negative/HER2-positive subtype, the highest (30.6%). The HR-negative, HER2-negative subtype (triple-negative breast cancer, TNBC) had the worst survival rate. HR-positive disease, irrespective of HER2 status, had poor prognosis that did not differ from that of the HR-negative/HER2-positive subtype with regard to OS or DFS. Achieving pCR, no evidence of vascular invasion, non-TNBC, adjuvant hormonal therapy, and radiotherapy were associated with longer DFS and OS.
Hormone receptor and HER2 molecular subtypes had limited predictive and prognostic power in our IBC population. All molecular subtypes of IBC had a poor prognosis. HR-positive status did not necessarily confer a good prognosis. For all IBC subtypes, novel, specific treatment strategies are needed in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings.
激素受体(HR)和HER2状态所定义的亚型在炎性乳腺癌(IBC)中的研究尚不充分。我们对临床参数和长期预后进行了特征分析,并在大量IBC患者群体中比较了HR/HER2亚型的病理完全缓解(pCR)率。我们还比较了接受靶向治疗(抗激素、抗HER2)的IBC患者与未接受靶向治疗的患者之间的无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)。
我们回顾性分析了1989年1月至2011年1月在MD安德森癌症中心诊断并接受治疗的IBC患者的记录。其中,527例患者接受了新辅助化疗,且有雌激素受体(ER)、孕激素受体(PR)和HER2状态的可用信息。如果ER或PR状态为阳性,则HR状态被视为阳性。使用Kaplan-Meier方法,我们从确定性手术时间开始估计中位DFS和OS持续时间。使用Cox比例风险回归模型,我们确定了预后因素对DFS和OS的影响。结果按亚型进行比较。
III期IBC的总体pCR率为15.2%,HR阳性/HER2阴性亚型的pCR率最低(7.5%),HR阴性/HER2阳性亚型的pCR率最高(30.6%)。HR阴性、HER2阴性亚型(三阴性乳腺癌,TNBC)的生存率最差。HR阳性疾病,无论HER2状态如何,预后均较差,在OS或DFS方面与HR阴性/HER2阳性亚型无差异。达到pCR、无血管侵犯证据、非TNBC、辅助激素治疗和放疗与更长的DFS和OS相关。
激素受体和HER2分子亚型在我们的IBC人群中具有有限的预测和预后能力。IBC的所有分子亚型预后均较差。HR阳性状态不一定预示良好的预后。对于所有IBC亚型,在新辅助和辅助治疗环境中都需要新的、特异性的治疗策略。