Suppr超能文献

溃疡性结肠炎患者 C 反应蛋白水平和红细胞沉降率与内镜活动指数的相关性。

Correlations of C-reactive protein levels and erythrocyte sedimentation rates with endoscopic activity indices in patients with ulcerative colitis.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine and Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, Korea.

出版信息

Dig Dis Sci. 2014 Apr;59(4):829-37. doi: 10.1007/s10620-013-2907-3. Epub 2013 Dec 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accurate assessment of endoscopic severity is essential to the early detection of relapses and treatment of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). However, the relationships between non-invasive biomarkers and invasive endoscopic severity indices remain poorly understood.

METHODS

A total of 722 endoscopies in 552 patients were evaluated in this study. Endoscopic activity was assessed using five widely used endoscopic scoring systems: the Powell-Tuck assessment, Mayo Endoscopic Score, modified Baron Score, Rachmilewitz Endoscopic Activity Index, and Hanauer's Sigmoidoscopic Index. These five indices were compared with two non-invasive biomarkers, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels.

RESULTS

The Pearson's correlation coefficients of CRP and ESR with endoscopic indices were r = 0.457 and 0.342 in the Powell-Tuck assessment, r = 0.503 and r = 0.402 in the Mayo Endoscopic Score, r = 0.507 and 0.408 in Hanauer's Sigmoidoscopic Index, r = 0.520 and 0.433 in the modified Baron Score, and r = 0.523 and 0.435 in the Rachmilewitz Endoscopic Activity Index. Sensitivity and specificity ranges for CRP and ESR were 50.5-53.3 % and 68.7-71.3 % and 85.1-87.2 % and 63.4-66.4 %, respectively, for the detection of endoscopic remission using the five endoscopic indices.

CONCLUSIONS

CRP and ESR levels were modestly correlated with endoscopic activity indices in UC patients. However, the low sensitivities for detecting endoscopic remission suggest that CRP or ESR alone is not sufficient to reflect endoscopic severity accurately.

摘要

背景

准确评估内镜严重程度对于溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者的复发早期发现和治疗至关重要。然而,非侵入性生物标志物与侵入性内镜严重程度指数之间的关系仍知之甚少。

方法

本研究共评估了 552 例患者的 722 次内镜检查。使用五种广泛使用的内镜评分系统评估内镜活动度:Powell-Tuck 评估、Mayo 内镜评分、改良 Baron 评分、Rachmilewitz 内镜活动指数和 Hanauer 乙状结肠镜指数。将这五个指数与两种非侵入性生物标志物红细胞沉降率(ESR)和 C 反应蛋白(CRP)水平进行比较。

结果

CRP 和 ESR 与 Powell-Tuck 评估中内镜指数的 Pearson 相关系数分别为 r = 0.457 和 0.342,在 Mayo 内镜评分中分别为 r = 0.503 和 r = 0.402,在 Hanauer 乙状结肠镜指数中分别为 r = 0.507 和 r = 0.408,在改良 Baron 评分中分别为 r = 0.520 和 r = 0.433,在 Rachmilewitz 内镜活动指数中分别为 r = 0.523 和 r = 0.435。CRP 和 ESR 用于检测五种内镜指数的内镜缓解的灵敏度和特异性范围分别为 50.5-53.3%和 68.7-71.3%和 85.1-87.2%和 63.4-66.4%。

结论

CRP 和 ESR 水平与 UC 患者的内镜活动指数中度相关。然而,检测内镜缓解的灵敏度较低表明 CRP 或 ESR 单独不足以准确反映内镜严重程度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验