Yale University.
California State University-Chico.
Child Dev. 2014 May-Jun;85(3):1123-1133. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12198. Epub 2013 Dec 6.
Inequalities are everywhere, yet little is known about how children respond to people affected by inequalities. This article explores two responses-minimizing inequalities and favoring those who are advantaged by them. In Studies 1a (N = 37) and 1b (N = 38), 4- and 5-year-olds allocated a resource to a disadvantaged recipient, but judged advantaged recipients more positively. In Studies (N = 38) and (N = 74), a delay occurred between seeing the inequality and allocating resources, or stating a preference, during which time participants forgot who was initially more advantaged. Children then favored advantaged recipients on the preference and resource allocation measures, suggesting an implicit "affective tagging" mechanism drives the tendency to favor the advantaged. In contrast, reducing inequalities through resource allocation appears to require explicit reasoning.
不平等现象无处不在,但人们对儿童如何应对受不平等影响的人知之甚少。本文探讨了两种反应——最小化不平等和偏袒那些从中受益的人。在研究 1a(N=37)和 1b(N=38)中,4 岁和 5 岁的儿童将资源分配给处于不利地位的接受者,但对处于有利地位的接受者的评价更为积极。在研究 2(N=38)和研究 3(N=74)中,在看到不平等现象和分配资源或表达偏好之间存在延迟,在此期间,参与者忘记了最初谁更有优势。然后,儿童在偏好和资源分配方面偏向于优势接受者,这表明一种隐含的“情感标记”机制驱动了偏袒优势的倾向。相比之下,通过资源分配来减少不平等似乎需要明确的推理。