Suppr超能文献

临界闪烁频率和心理测肝性脑病评分在诊断轻度肝性脑病中的价值。

Value of critical flicker frequency and psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score in diagnosis of low-grade hepatic encephalopathy.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf.

Institute of Psychology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

Gastroenterology. 2014 Apr;146(4):961-9. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.12.026. Epub 2013 Dec 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Critical flicker frequency (CFF) and psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score (PHES) analyses are widely used to diagnose hepatic encephalopathy (HE), but little is known about their value in the diagnosis of low-grade HE.

METHODS

The diagnostic values of CFF and PHES were compared using a computerized test battery and West Haven criteria as reference. We performed CFF analysis on 559 patients with cirrhosis and 261 without (controls). Of these 820 patients, 448 were evaluated using a modified PHES system and 148 were also evaluated using the conventional PHES system.

RESULTS

CFF distinguished between patients with overt HE and without minimal or overt HE in the entire study population with 98% sensitivity and 94% specificity and in the subgroup of patients who were evaluated by conventional PHES with 97% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Conventional PHES identified patients with overt HE with 73% sensitivity and 89% specificity. CFF distinguished between patients with and without minimal HE with only 37% sensitivity but 94% specificity (entire study population). In the subgroup of patients evaluated by conventional PHES, CFF distinguished between patients with and without minimal HE with 22% sensitivity and 100% specificity; these values were similar to those for conventional PHES (30% sensitivity and 89% specificity). The modified PHES distinguished between patients with and without minimal HE with 49% sensitivity and 74% specificity. The diagnostic agreement values between CFF and conventional or modified PHES in patients with minimal HE were only 54% or 47%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In an analysis of patients with cirrhosis and controls, CFF distinguished between patients with overt HE and without minimal or overt HE. PHES testing produced a statistically significant difference among groups, but there was considerable overlap between controls and patients with overt HE. PHES, CFF, and a combination of PHES and CFF could not reliably distinguish patients with minimal HE from controls or those with overt HE.

摘要

背景与目的

临界闪烁频率(CFF)和心理计量肝性脑病评分(PHES)分析广泛用于诊断肝性脑病(HE),但对于它们在诊断轻度 HE 中的价值知之甚少。

方法

使用计算机测试电池和 West Haven 标准作为参考,比较了 CFF 和 PHES 的诊断价值。我们对 559 例肝硬化患者和 261 例无(对照)患者进行了 CFF 分析。在这 820 例患者中,448 例采用改良 PHES 系统进行评估,148 例采用常规 PHES 系统进行评估。

结果

CFF 在整个研究人群中区分了显性 HE 患者和无最小或显性 HE 患者,敏感性为 98%,特异性为 94%,在接受常规 PHES 评估的亚组中,敏感性为 97%,特异性为 100%。常规 PHES 确定显性 HE 患者的敏感性为 73%,特异性为 89%。CFF 仅以 37%的敏感性但 94%的特异性区分了有最小 HE 和无最小 HE 的患者(整个研究人群)。在接受常规 PHES 评估的亚组中,CFF 以 22%的敏感性和 100%的特异性区分了有最小 HE 和无最小 HE 的患者;这些值与常规 PHES 相似(30%的敏感性和 89%的特异性)。改良 PHES 以 49%的敏感性和 74%的特异性区分了有最小 HE 和无最小 HE 的患者。在最小 HE 患者中,CFF 与常规或改良 PHES 的诊断一致性值分别仅为 54%或 47%。

结论

在对肝硬化患者和对照者的分析中,CFF 区分了显性 HE 患者和无最小或显性 HE 患者。PHES 测试在组间产生了统计学上显著的差异,但在对照者和显性 HE 患者之间存在相当大的重叠。PHES、CFF 以及 PHES 和 CFF 的组合不能可靠地区分最小 HE 患者与对照者或显性 HE 患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验