Chang Han Soo, Fujisawa Naoaki, Tsuchiya Tsukasa, Oya Soichi, Matsui Toru
From the Department of Neurosurgery, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Kawagoe, Saitama, Japan.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Mar 1;39(5):400-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000161.
Prospective subcohort study.
To determine whether preoperative presence of degenerative spondylolisthesis worsens the outcome of patients undergoing unilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression for lumbar stenosis.
The standard surgical treatment for degenerative spondylolisthesis with lumbar stenosis is lumbar fusion after standard laminectomy. Although this strategy is widely adopted, it is not supported by class I evidence. This strategy assumes that degenerative spondylolisthesis worsens the outcome of laminectomy by causing postoperative instability. However, instability may be reduced or prevented by the use of less invasive decompression techniques.
To test the hypothesis that preoperative degenerative spondylolisthesis worsens the outcome of less invasive lumbar decompression, we performed a prospective cohort study of 165 consecutive patients who underwent unilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression at our institution. The patients were prospectively followed with a standardized questionnaire, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, and standing lumbar radiographs for a maximum follow-up period of 5 years. According to the presence or absence of degenerative spondylolisthesis, the patients were divided into 2 groups: an olisthesis group and a nonolisthesis group.
The average 36-Item Short Form Health Survey physical score and bodily pain score improved substantially immediately after surgery. This improvement was maintained up to 5 years postoperatively. Progression of slippage was uncommon in both groups, with an overall incidence of 8% at 5 years of follow-up. There was no significant difference in the average physical score, the bodily pain score, or the rate of progression of slippage between the olisthesis and nonolisthesis groups.
Our study thus indicates that preoperative degenerative spondylolisthesis does not worsen the outcome of patients with lumbar stenosis undergoing unilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression. These results suggest that lumbar fusion is often unnecessary in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and lumbar stenosis if the posterior decompression technique is unilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression.
前瞻性亚队列研究。
确定术前存在退行性椎体滑脱是否会使接受单侧椎板切开双侧减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症患者的手术效果变差。
退行性椎体滑脱合并腰椎管狭窄症的标准外科治疗方法是标准椎板切除术后行腰椎融合术。尽管这一策略被广泛采用,但缺乏I级证据支持。该策略假定退行性椎体滑脱会导致术后不稳定,从而使椎板切除术的效果变差。然而,采用创伤较小的减压技术可能会减少或预防不稳定的发生。
为验证术前退行性椎体滑脱会使创伤较小的腰椎减压手术效果变差这一假设,我们对在我院接受单侧椎板切开双侧减压的165例连续患者进行了前瞻性队列研究。采用标准化问卷、36项简明健康调查量表对患者进行前瞻性随访,并拍摄腰椎站立位X线片,最长随访期为5年。根据是否存在退行性椎体滑脱,将患者分为两组:椎体滑脱组和非椎体滑脱组。
术后即刻,平均36项简明健康调查量表的身体评分和躯体疼痛评分显著改善。这种改善在术后5年一直保持。两组中滑脱进展均不常见,随访5年时总体发生率为8%。椎体滑脱组和非椎体滑脱组在平均身体评分、躯体疼痛评分或滑脱进展率方面无显著差异。
因此,我们的研究表明,术前退行性椎体滑脱并不会使接受单侧椎板切开双侧减压的腰椎管狭窄症患者的手术效果变差。这些结果表明,如果后路减压技术是单侧椎板切开双侧减压,那么对于退行性椎体滑脱合并腰椎管狭窄症的患者,通常无需进行腰椎融合术。
2级。