Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI; Brown University, Providence, RI.
Department of Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Jan;95(1 Suppl):S74-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.06.037.
Clinician feedback and thought processes about treatment classification and description will aid development of the rehabilitation treatment taxonomy (RTT) presented in this supplement. Here, we discuss comparisons between the proposed RTT and an inductive practice-based evidence (PBE) model used to describe rehabilitation treatments. Interviews with clinicians well versed with PBE highlight the complexity of rehabilitation treatments, and bring to light potential advantages and challenges of a deductive, theory-driven classification to uncover the black box of rehabilitation.
临床医生对治疗分类和描述的反馈和思维过程将有助于本增刊中提出的康复治疗分类法(RTT)的发展。在这里,我们讨论了拟议的 RTT 与用于描述康复治疗的归纳实践基础证据(PBE)模型之间的比较。对精通 PBE 的临床医生进行的访谈强调了康复治疗的复杂性,并揭示了一种演绎的、理论驱动的分类的潜在优势和挑战,以揭示康复的黑箱。