Cartwright C, Montgomery J, Rhee J, Zwar N, Banbury A
ASLaRC Aged Services Unit, Southern Cross University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
Intern Med J. 2014 Mar;44(3):234-9. doi: 10.1111/imj.12354.
Advance care planning (ACP) provides patients with the ability to make their decisions known about how they would like to be treated if they lose capacity. Medical practitioners have a key role to play in providing information on ACP to their patients. This research explores their knowledge and attitudes to advance care planning and how this affects their practice.
The objective of this study is to assess the NSW medical practitioners' knowledge and self-reported practice of ACP.
A postal survey of a random sample of 650 general practitioners plus 350 medical specialists from specialties most often involved in end-of-life decisions was conducted. Respondents' work location post codes were subsequently used to assign respondents to one of the eight NSW Area Health Services. The main outcome measures were medical practitioners' knowledge of and practice pertaining to ACP.
Thirty-four per cent of specialists (n = 110) and 24% of general practitioners (n = 150) responded; the majority of respondents had heard of all ACP options. However, respondents' understanding of the uses and legal requirements of the relevant ACP options vary widely.
Respect for patient wishes expressed in advance directives is reassuringly high. The findings suggest significant misunderstanding by medical practitioners of terminologies and systems around substitute decision-making for incompetent persons. Further education and standardisation of terminologies and systems across different jurisdictions would assist in addressing these issues. Low response rate, relating to only one legal jurisdiction, means results may not be generalisable.
预先照护计划(ACP)使患者能够表明如果他们丧失行为能力,希望接受何种治疗的决定。医生在向患者提供有关预先照护计划的信息方面发挥着关键作用。本研究探讨他们对预先照护计划的知识和态度,以及这如何影响他们的实践。
本研究的目的是评估新南威尔士州医生对预先照护计划的知识和自我报告的实践情况。
对650名全科医生和350名来自最常参与临终决策专科的医学专家进行随机抽样的邮政调查。随后,根据受访者的工作地点邮政编码将其分配到新南威尔士州八个地区卫生服务机构之一。主要结果指标是医生对预先照护计划的知识和实践情况。
34%的专科医生(n = 110)和24%的全科医生(n = 150)做出了回应;大多数受访者听说过所有预先照护计划选项。然而,受访者对相关预先照护计划选项的用途和法律要求的理解差异很大。
令人欣慰的是,对预先指示中表达的患者意愿的尊重程度很高。研究结果表明,医生对无行为能力者替代决策的术语和系统存在重大误解。不同司法管辖区的术语和系统的进一步教育和标准化将有助于解决这些问题。仅涉及一个法律管辖区的低回应率意味着结果可能无法推广。