Wang Guo-qing, Bao Lei, Zhao Xi-xia, Zhang Jun, Nan Ke-jun
Department of Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi-an Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Xi-an, 710061, China.
Tumour Biol. 2014 May;35(5):4107-12. doi: 10.1007/s13277-013-1537-x. Epub 2013 Dec 28.
Genetic polymorphisms in the Fas/Fas ligand (FasL) gene were proposed to be associated with susceptibility to cervical cancer, but previous studies reported controversial findings. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the associations between Fas/FasL polymorphisms and susceptibility to cervical cancer. We carried out a literature search in PubMed and Embase databases for studies on the associations between Fas/FasL polymorphisms and susceptibility to cervical cancer. The associations were assessed by odds ratio (OR) together with its 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Eleven individual studies with a total of 6,919 subjects were finally included into the meta-analysis. Overall, there was no association between Fas 1377G > A polymorphism and susceptibility to cervical cancer (A vs. G: OR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.88-1.12, P = 0.91; AA vs. GG: OR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.76-1.32, P = 0.99; AA/GA vs. GG: OR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.81-1.12, P = 0.54; AA vs.
GG/GA: OR = 1.11, 95% CI 0.85-1.43, P = 0.45). In addition, there was also no association between FasL 844 T > C polymorphism and susceptibility to cervical cancer (C vs. T: OR = 1.12, 95% CI 0.91-1.36, P = 0.28; CC vs. TT: OR = 1.17, 95% CI 0.90-1.51, P = 0.24; CC/TC vs. TT: OR = 1.13, 95% CI 0.92-1.39, P = 0.24; CC vs.
TT/TC: OR = 1.11, 95% CI 0.83-1.50, P = 0.47). In subgroup analysis by ethnicity, there were also no associations between Fas/FasL polymorphisms and susceptibility to cervical cancer in Asians and Africans. In conclusion, Fas 1377G > A polymorphism and FasL 844 T > C polymorphism are both not associated with susceptibility to cervical cancer.
Fas/Fas配体(FasL)基因的遗传多态性被认为与宫颈癌易感性相关,但先前的研究报告结果存在争议。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以评估Fas/FasL多态性与宫颈癌易感性之间的关联。我们在PubMed和Embase数据库中进行文献检索,以查找关于Fas/FasL多态性与宫颈癌易感性之间关联的研究。通过比值比(OR)及其95%置信区间(CI)评估关联。最终,共有11项涉及6919名受试者的个体研究被纳入荟萃分析。总体而言,Fas 1377G>A多态性与宫颈癌易感性之间无关联(A vs. G:OR = 0.99,95%CI 0.88 - 1.12,P = 0.91;AA vs. GG:OR = 1.00,95%CI 0.76 - 1.32,P = 0.99;AA/GA vs. GG:OR = 0.95,95%CI 0.81 - 1.12,P = 0.54;AA vs. GG/GA:OR = 1.11,95%CI 0.85 - 1.43,P = 0.45)。此外,FasL 844 T>C多态性与宫颈癌易感性之间也无关联(C vs. T:OR = 1.12,95%CI 0.91 - 1.36,P = 0.28;CC vs. TT:OR = 1.17,95%CI 0.90 - 1.51,P = 0.24;CC/TC vs. TT:OR = 1.13,95%CI 0.92 - 1.39,P = 0.24;CC vs. TT/TC:OR = 1.11,95%CI 0.83 - 1.50,P = 0.47)。在按种族进行的亚组分析中,亚洲人和非洲人中Fas/FasL多态性与宫颈癌易感性之间也无关联。总之,Fas 1377G>A多态性和FasL 844 T>C多态性均与宫颈癌易感性无关。