Suppr超能文献

同一位外科医生在低容量医院和高容量中心进行的腹腔镜胃切除术的结果比较。

Comparison of the outcomes for laparoscopic gastrectomy performed by the same surgeon between a low-volume hospital and a high-volume center.

作者信息

Kim Min Gyu, Kwon Sung Joon

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, 222 Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea,

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2014 May;28(5):1563-70. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3352-2. Epub 2014 Jan 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The volume-outcome relationship in laparoscopic surgery is controversial. This study was designed to identify differences in laparoscopic gastrectomy outcomes between a low-volume hospital and a high-volume center and to provide guidelines for overcoming the problems associated with a low-volume hospital.

METHODS

From April 2009 to November 2012, one surgeon performed 134 totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomies (TLDGs) at a high-volume center (HVC; ASAN Medical Center) and at a low-volume hospital (LVH; Hanyang University Guri Hospital). All laparoscopically assisted gastrectomies were excluded from this study. During the early period of laparoscopic gastrectomy at the low-volume hospital, TLDG with Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy (RYGJ) was performed according to the surgeon's choice. The reconstruction method was classified as gastroduodenostomy (GD) or RYGJ. Early surgical outcomes achieved at the LVH were investigated and compared with those obtained at the HVC.

RESULTS

The early surgical outcomes differed significantly between the two hospitals. In particular, the postoperative complication rate for the patients who underwent TLDG RYGJ at the LVH was higher than at the HVC (LVH 15.4 % vs. HVC 0 %; p = 0.037). Furthermore, significant differences were observed in the mean operation time (TLDG GD: LVH 141.0 min vs. HVC 117.4 min, p = 0.001; TLDG RYGJ: LVH 186.3 min vs. HVC 134.6 min, p = 0.009) and length of hospital stay (TLDG GD: LVH 8.1 days vs. HVC 7.2 days, p = 0.044; TLDG RYGJ: LVH 11.5 day vs. HVC 6.8 day, p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Although all the operations were performed by one experienced surgeon, the early surgical outcomes differed significantly between the low- and high-volume hospitals. Low-volume hospitals often lack well-trained surgical professionals such as first assistants and scrub nurses. Therefore, the authors recommend that a surgeon who works at an LVH should assess potential personnel shortages and find a solution before operating.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜手术中手术量与手术结果的关系存在争议。本研究旨在确定低手术量医院和高手术量中心在腹腔镜胃切除术结果上的差异,并为克服低手术量医院相关问题提供指导方针。

方法

2009年4月至2012年11月,一名外科医生在高手术量中心(ASAN医疗中心)和低手术量医院(汉阳大学九里医院)进行了134例全腹腔镜远端胃切除术(TLDG)。所有腹腔镜辅助胃切除术均被排除在本研究之外。在低手术量医院腹腔镜胃切除术的早期阶段,根据外科医生的选择进行了 Roux-en-Y 胃空肠吻合术(RYGJ)的 TLDG。重建方法分为胃十二指肠吻合术(GD)或 RYGJ。对低手术量医院取得的早期手术结果进行了调查,并与高手术量中心取得的结果进行了比较。

结果

两家医院的早期手术结果存在显著差异。特别是,在低手术量医院接受 TLDG RYGJ 的患者术后并发症发生率高于高手术量中心(低手术量医院为15.4%,高手术量中心为0%;p = 0.037)。此外,在平均手术时间(TLDG GD:低手术量医院141.0分钟,高手术量中心117.4分钟,p = 0.001;TLDG RYGJ:低手术量医院186.3分钟,高手术量中心134.6分钟,p = 0.009)和住院时间(TLDG GD:低手术量医院8.1天,高手术量中心7.2天,p = 0.044;TLDG RYGJ:低手术量医院11.5天,高手术量中心6.8天,p = 0.009)方面观察到显著差异。

结论

尽管所有手术均由一名经验丰富的外科医生进行,但低手术量医院和高手术量医院的早期手术结果仍存在显著差异。低手术量医院往往缺乏训练有素的外科专业人员,如第一助手和刷手护士。因此,作者建议在低手术量医院工作的外科医生在手术前应评估潜在的人员短缺情况并找到解决方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验