Rahman Rubina, Bong Chun Xiao, Stephenson John
*Department of Ophthalmology, Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom; and †School of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom.
Retina. 2014 Jul;34(7):1415-20. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000072.
To evaluate the accuracy of intraocular lens power estimation in eyes having phacovitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.
Retrospective case review of 100 consecutive eyes that underwent phacovitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Axial lengths were measured using optical biometry and/or ultrasound A-scan. Achieved and predicted refraction were compared to calculate the mean postoperative refractive prediction error and the mean absolute prediction error. Factorial analysis of variance models were developed to assess outcome on the whole and that between the subgroups.
Ninety-five eyes had postoperative refraction: 41 macula-on (43%) and 54 macula-off (57%). The mean postoperative prediction error was -0.34 ± 0.89 diopters. There was no statistical significant difference in the refractive outcomes between macula-on and macula-off groups (P > 0.05). Overall, using mean absolute prediction error as the outcome measure, optical biometry was more accurate than ultrasound (P = 0.040). However, significantly more ultrasound-measured axial lengths were selected for intraocular lens power estimation in macula-off group compared with the macula-on group (P = 0.016).
Combined phacovitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment included a small biometric error that was within the tolerable range in most cases. Both optical biometry and ultrasound should be used to estimate axial lengths, for macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment cases, to improve the accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation.
评估行晶状体玻璃体切除术治疗孔源性视网膜脱离的患眼中人工晶状体度数估算的准确性。
对连续100例行晶状体玻璃体切除术治疗孔源性视网膜脱离的患眼进行回顾性病例分析。使用光学生物测量法和/或超声A超测量眼轴长度。比较实际屈光度数和预测屈光度数,以计算术后平均屈光预测误差和平均绝对预测误差。建立方差分析模型以评估总体结果及亚组间结果。
95只眼有术后屈光度数:41只黄斑在位(43%),54只黄斑脱离(57%)。术后平均预测误差为-0.34±0.89屈光度。黄斑在位组和黄斑脱离组的屈光结果无统计学显著差异(P>0.05)。总体而言,以平均绝对预测误差作为结果指标,光学生物测量法比超声更准确(P=0.040)。然而,与黄斑在位组相比,黄斑脱离组中更多选择超声测量的眼轴长度来估算人工晶状体度数(P=0.016)。
孔源性视网膜脱离联合晶状体玻璃体切除术存在较小的生物测量误差,大多数情况下在可耐受范围内。对于黄斑脱离的孔源性视网膜脱离病例,应同时使用光学生物测量法和超声来估算眼轴长度,以提高人工晶状体度数计算的准确性。