1 Laboratory of Cerebral Cortex, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.
Brain. 2014 Feb;137(Pt 2):463-85. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt348. Epub 2014 Jan 2.
Sharp wave-ripples and interictal events are physiological and pathological forms of transient high activity in the hippocampus with similar features. Sharp wave-ripples have been shown to be essential in memory consolidation, whereas epileptiform (interictal) events are thought to be damaging. It is essential to grasp the difference between physiological sharp wave-ripples and pathological interictal events to understand the failure of control mechanisms in the latter case. We investigated the dynamics of activity generated intrinsically in the Cornu Ammonis region 3 of the mouse hippocampus in vitro, using four different types of intervention to induce epileptiform activity. As a result, sharp wave-ripples spontaneously occurring in Cornu Ammonis region 3 disappeared, and following an asynchronous transitory phase, activity reorganized into a new form of pathological synchrony. During epileptiform events, all neurons increased their firing rate compared to sharp wave-ripples. Different cell types showed complementary firing: parvalbumin-positive basket cells and some axo-axonic cells stopped firing as a result of a depolarization block at the climax of the events in high potassium, 4-aminopyridine and zero magnesium models, but not in the gabazine model. In contrast, pyramidal cells began firing maximally at this stage. To understand the underlying mechanism we measured changes of intrinsic neuronal and transmission parameters in the high potassium model. We found that the cellular excitability increased and excitatory transmission was enhanced, whereas inhibitory transmission was compromised. We observed a strong short-term depression in parvalbumin-positive basket cell to pyramidal cell transmission. Thus, the collapse of pyramidal cell perisomatic inhibition appears to be a crucial factor in the emergence of epileptiform events.
尖波涟漪和发作间期事件是海马体中短暂高强度活动的生理和病理形式,具有相似的特征。已经表明尖波涟漪对于记忆巩固是必不可少的,而癫痫样(发作间期)事件被认为是有害的。理解后者控制机制失效的原因,必须要把握生理尖波涟漪和病理发作间期事件之间的区别。我们使用四种不同的干预方法在体外研究了小鼠海马体 CA3 区固有产生的活动的动力学,以诱导癫痫样活动。结果,CA3 区自发发生的尖波涟漪消失,并且在异步暂态相之后,活动重新组织成新的病理性同步形式。在癫痫样事件期间,与尖波涟漪相比,所有神经元的放电率都增加了。不同的细胞类型表现出互补的放电:在高钾、4-氨基吡啶和零镁模型中,由于去极化阻断,副甲状腺蛋白阳性 basket 细胞和一些轴突-轴突细胞在事件的高潮时停止放电,但在 gabazine 模型中则不会。相比之下,在这个阶段,锥体细胞开始最大程度地放电。为了理解潜在的机制,我们在高钾模型中测量了内在神经元和传递参数的变化。我们发现细胞兴奋性增加,兴奋性传递增强,而抑制性传递受损。我们观察到副甲状腺蛋白阳性 basket 细胞到锥体细胞传递的强烈短期抑制。因此,锥体细胞树突抑制的崩溃似乎是癫痫样事件出现的关键因素。