Espinel-Ingroff A, Pfaller M A, Bustamante B, Canton E, Fothergill A, Fuller J, Gonzalez G M, Lass-Flörl C, Lockhart S R, Martin-Mazuelos E, Meis J F, Melhem M S C, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Pelaez T, Szeszs M W, St-Germain G, Bonfietti L X, Guarro J, Turnidge J
VCU Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(4):2006-12. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02615-13. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
Although epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs) have been established for Candida spp. and the triazoles, they are based on MIC data from a single laboratory. We have established ECVs for eight Candida species and fluconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole based on wild-type (WT) MIC distributions for isolates of C. albicans (n=11,241 isolates), C. glabrata (7,538), C. parapsilosis (6,023), C. tropicalis (3,748), C. krusei (1,073), C. lusitaniae (574), C. guilliermondii (373), and C. dubliniensis (162). The 24-h CLSI broth microdilution MICs were collated from multiple laboratories (in Canada, Brazil, Europe, Mexico, Peru, and the United States). The ECVs for distributions originating from ≥6 laboratories, which included ≥95% of the modeled WT population, for fluconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole were, respectively, 0.5, 0.06 and 0.03 μg/ml for C. albicans, 0.5, 0.25, and 0.03 μg/ml for C. dubliniensis, 8, 1, and 0.25 μg/ml for C. glabrata, 8, 0.5, and 0.12 μg/ml for C. guilliermondii, 32, 0.5, and 0.25 μg/ml for C. krusei, 1, 0.06, and 0.06 μg/ml for C. lusitaniae, 1, 0.25, and 0.03 μg/ml for C. parapsilosis, and 1, 0.12, and 0.06 μg/ml for C. tropicalis. The low number of MICs (<100) for other less prevalent species (C. famata, C. kefyr, C. orthopsilosis, C. rugosa) precluded ECV definition, but their MIC distributions are documented. Evaluation of our ECVs for some species/agent combinations using published individual MICs for 136 isolates (harboring mutations in or upregulation of ERG11, MDR1, CDR1, or CDR2) and 64 WT isolates indicated that our ECVs may be useful in distinguishing WT from non-WT isolates.
虽然已经为念珠菌属和三唑类药物确定了流行病学截断值(ECV),但这些值是基于单个实验室的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)数据。我们基于白色念珠菌(11241株分离株)、光滑念珠菌(7538株)、近平滑念珠菌(6023株)、热带念珠菌(3748株)、克柔念珠菌(1073株)、葡萄牙念珠菌(574株)、季也蒙念珠菌(373株)和都柏林念珠菌(162株)分离株的野生型(WT)MIC分布,为8种念珠菌以及氟康唑、泊沙康唑和伏立康唑确定了ECV。24小时CLSI肉汤微量稀释MIC数据来自多个实验室(加拿大、巴西、欧洲、墨西哥、秘鲁和美国)。对于来自≥6个实验室(涵盖≥95%的模拟WT群体)的分布,白色念珠菌的氟康唑、泊沙康唑和伏立康唑的ECV分别为0.5、0.06和0.03μg/ml,都柏林念珠菌分别为0.5、0.25和0.03μg/ml,光滑念珠菌分别为8、1和0.25μg/ml,季也蒙念珠菌分别为8、0.5和0.12μg/ml,克柔念珠菌分别为32、0.5和0.25μg/ml,葡萄牙念珠菌分别为1、0.06和0.06μg/ml,近平滑念珠菌分别为1、0.25和0.03μg/ml,热带念珠菌分别为1、0.12和0.06μg/ml。其他不太常见的念珠菌物种(法塔念珠菌、克菲念珠菌、正平滑念珠菌、皱落念珠菌)的MIC数量较少(<100),无法确定ECV,但记录了它们的MIC分布。使用已发表的136株分离株(ERG11、MDR1、CDR1或CDR2发生突变或上调)和64株WT分离株的个体MIC对我们确定的某些物种/药物组合的ECV进行评估,结果表明我们确定的ECV可能有助于区分WT和非WT分离株。