University of Arizona.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014 Jan 6;15(1):4429. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v15i1.4429.
The objective of this work is to evaluate dosimetric impact of multilumen balloon applicator rotation in high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for breast cancer. Highly asymmetrical dose distribution was generated for patients A and B, depending upon applicator proximity to skin and rib. Both skin and rib spacing was ≤ 0.7 cm for A; only rib spacing was ≤ 0.7 cm for B. Thirty-five rotation scenarios were simulated for each patient by rotating outer lumens every 10° over ± 180° range with respect to central lumen using mathematically calculated rotational matrix. Thirty-five rotated plans were compared with three plans: 1) original multidwell multilumen (MDML) plan, 2) multidwell single-lumen (MDSL) plan, and 3) single-dwell single-lumen (SDSL) plan. For plan comparison, planning target volume for evaluation (PTV_EVAL) coverage (dose to 95% and 90% volume of PTV_EVAL) (D95 and D90), skin and rib maximal dose (Dmax), and normal breast tissue volume receiving 150% (V150) and 200% (V200) of prescribed dose (PD) were evaluated. Dose variation due to device rotation ranged from -5.6% to 0.8% (A) and -6.5% to 0.2% (B) for PTV_EVAL D95; -5.2% to 0.4% (A) and -4.1% to 0.7% (B) for PTV_EVAL D90; -2.0 to 18.4% (A) and -7.8 to 17.5% (B) for skin Dmax; -11.1 to 22.8% (A) and -4.7 to 55.1% (B) of PD for rib Dmax, respectively. Normal breast tissue V150 and V200 variation was < 1.0 cc, except for -0.1 to 2.5cc (B) of V200. Furthermore, 30° device rotation increased rib Dmax over 145% of PD: 152.9% (A) by clockwise 30° rotation and 152.5% (B) by counterclockwise 30° rotation. For a highly asymmetric dose distribution, device rotation can outweigh the potential benefit of improved dose shaping capability afforded by multilumen and make dosimetric data worse than single-lumen plans unless it is properly corrected.
这项工作的目的是评估多管球囊施源器旋转对乳腺癌高剂量率(HDR)近距离放疗的剂量学影响。对于患者 A 和 B,根据施源器与皮肤和肋骨的接近程度,产生了高度不对称的剂量分布。对于 A,皮肤和肋骨之间的间距均≤0.7cm;而对于 B,仅肋骨之间的间距≤0.7cm。对于每个患者,通过相对于中央管腔以每 10°的间隔旋转外管腔,在±180°范围内使用数学计算的旋转矩阵模拟了 35 种旋转情况。与三种方案进行了 35 个旋转计划的比较:1)原始多管多腔(MDML)计划,2)多管单腔(MDSL)计划和 3)单管单腔(SDSL)计划。对于计划比较,使用评估计划靶区(PTV_EVAL)覆盖率(PTV_EVAL 的剂量至 95%和 90%体积)(D95 和 D90)、皮肤和肋骨最大剂量(Dmax)以及接受处方剂量(PD)150%(V150)和 200%(V200)的正常乳腺组织体积(V150 和 V200)来评估计划。由于设备旋转引起的剂量变化范围为 A 为-5.6%至 0.8%,B 为-6.5%至 0.2%(A 和 B);PTV_EVAL D90 的 A 为-5.2%至 0.4%,B 为-4.1%至 0.7%;A 的皮肤 Dmax 为 2.0%至 18.4%,B 的皮肤 Dmax 为-7.8%至 17.5%;A 的肋骨 Dmax 为 PD 的 11.1%至 22.8%,B 的肋骨 Dmax 为 4.7%至 55.1%,分别。除了 B 为-0.1 至 2.5cc 外,正常乳腺组织的 V150 和 V200 变化均小于 1.0cc。此外,30°的设备旋转使肋骨 Dmax 超过 PD 的 145%:顺时针 30°旋转时为 152.9%(A),逆时针 30°旋转时为 152.5%(B)。对于高度不对称的剂量分布,如果不进行适当校正,则设备旋转可能会超过多腔管提供的改善剂量成型能力的潜在益处,并使剂量学数据比单腔计划更差。