Suppr超能文献

如果我们不能再提供长期的基于专家的护理,澳大利亚乳腺癌幸存者更愿意接受什么样的后续服务?一项离散选择实验。

What sort of follow-up services would Australian breast cancer survivors prefer if we could no longer offer long-term specialist-based care? A discrete choice experiment.

机构信息

School of Population Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia.

School of Medicine, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia 5042, Australia.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 2014 Feb 18;110(4):859-67. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.800. Epub 2014 Jan 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early diagnosis and improved treatment outcomes have increased breast cancer survival rates that, in turn, have led to increased numbers of women undergoing follow-up after completion of primary treatment. The current workload growth is unsustainable for breast cancer specialists who also provide care for women newly diagnosed or with a recurrence. Appropriate and acceptable follow-up care is important; yet, currently we know little about patient preferences. The aim of this study was to explore the preferences of Australian breast cancer survivors for alternative modes of delivery of follow-up services.

METHODS

A self-administered questionnaire (online or paper) was developed. The questionnaire contained a discrete choice experiment (DCE) designed to explore patient preferences with respect to provider, location, frequency and method of delivery of routine follow-up care in years 3, 4 and 5 after diagnosis, as well as the perceived value of 'drop-in' clinics providing additional support. Participants were recruited throughout Australia over a 6-month period from May to October 2012. Preference scores and choice probabilities were used to rank the top 10 most preferred follow-up scenarios for respondents.

RESULTS

A total of 836 women participated in the study, of whom 722 (86.4%) completed the DCE. In the absence of specialist follow-up, the 10 most valued surveillance scenarios all included a Breast Physician as the provider of follow-up care. The most preferred scenario is a face-to-face local breast cancer follow-up clinic held every 6 months and led by a Breast Physician, where additional clinics focused on the side effects of treatment are also provided.

CONCLUSION

Beyond the first 2 years from diagnosis, in the absence of a specialist led follow-up, women prefer to have their routine breast cancer follow-up by a Breast Physician (or a Breast Cancer Nurse) in a dedicated local breast cancer clinic, rather than with their local General Practitioner. Drop-in clinics for the management of treatment related side effects and to provide advice to both develop and maintain good health are also highly valued by breast cancer survivors.

摘要

背景

早期诊断和改善治疗效果提高了乳腺癌的存活率,进而导致更多完成主要治疗的女性需要接受后续治疗。目前,乳腺癌专家的工作量不断增加,他们还需要为新诊断或复发的女性提供护理。提供适当和可接受的后续护理非常重要;然而,目前我们对患者的偏好知之甚少。本研究旨在探讨澳大利亚乳腺癌幸存者对替代后续服务提供模式的偏好。

方法

开发了一份自我管理问卷(在线或纸质)。该问卷包含一个离散选择实验(DCE),旨在探讨患者对以下方面的偏好:在诊断后 3、4 和 5 年内提供常规随访护理的提供者、地点、频率和方法,以及“随时就诊”诊所提供额外支持的感知价值。参与者在 2012 年 5 月至 10 月期间在澳大利亚各地招募了 6 个月。使用偏好评分和选择概率对受访者的前 10 个最受欢迎的随访方案进行排名。

结果

共有 836 名女性参与了这项研究,其中 722 名(86.4%)完成了 DCE。在没有专家后续治疗的情况下,10 个最有价值的监测方案都包括乳腺医生作为后续护理的提供者。最受欢迎的方案是每 6 个月在当地进行一次面对面的乳腺癌随访诊所,由乳腺医生负责,同时还提供专门针对治疗副作用的额外诊所。

结论

在诊断后 2 年之后,如果没有专家主导的后续治疗,女性更愿意在当地的乳腺癌诊所由乳腺医生(或乳腺癌护士)进行常规的乳腺癌随访,而不是由当地的全科医生进行。对于管理治疗相关副作用以及提供建议以促进和保持良好健康的随时就诊诊所,乳腺癌幸存者也非常重视。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5590/3929879/075f8b9a4ee1/bjc2013800f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验